[OPSAWG] [Errata Verified] RFC8520 (7819)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 26 February 2024 09:05 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FADC14F6BC; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 01:05:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.659
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ImPGo3WMS7qj; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 01:05:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16917C14F6B8; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 01:05:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id D7F2F1A49941; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 01:05:01 -0800 (PST)
To: housley@vigilsec.com, lear@cisco.com, rdroms@gmail.com, dromasca@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rwilton@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240226090501.D7F2F1A49941@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 01:05:01 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/3VjOLiR2X_9o97SKeTT-sZIzaK0>
Subject: [OPSAWG] [Errata Verified] RFC8520 (7819)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 09:05:06 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC8520, "Manufacturer Usage Description Specification". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7819 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Date Reported: 2024-02-23 Verified by: Rob Wilton (IESG) Section: 13.1 Original Text ------------- Note: A MUD file may need to be re-signed if the signature expires. Corrected Text -------------- Note: A MUD file may need to be re-signed if the certificate needed to validate the signature expires. Notes ----- The signature does not expire, but the certificate does. -------------------------------------- RFC8520 (draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-25) -------------------------------------- Title : Manufacturer Usage Description Specification Publication Date : March 2019 Author(s) : E. Lear, R. Droms, D. Romascanu Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Operations and Management Area Working Group Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [OPSAWG] [Errata Verified] RFC8520 (7819) RFC Errata System