[OPSAWG] Martin Stiemerling's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-coman-use-cases-04: (with COMMENT)

"Martin Stiemerling" <mls.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 17 February 2015 21:17 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150217211710.20512.95285.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:17:10 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/3fSxJ1taBRKNyVFEjkeYQgaliM4>
Cc: opsawg-chairs@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsawg-coman-use-cases.all@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] Martin Stiemerling's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-coman-use-cases-04: (with COMMENT)

Martin Stiemerling has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-coman-use-cases-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-coman-use-cases/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The write-up says something about additional reviews. Does this include
reviews by an outside party of the IETF that, for instance, an entity
that operates building automation systems?

[OPSAWG] Martin Stiemerling's No Objection on dra… Martin Stiemerling
Re: [OPSAWG] Martin Stiemerling's No Objection on… Warren Kumari