[OPSAWG] Start of 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Wed, 15 June 2016 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6746212D87D for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id naXb4eUTgb6B for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22d.google.com (mail-qg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB18912D86A for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id v76so16250185qgv.3 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=pKPr2ZrKD2Dgn/YQ+UA+eeMTgwQ7mCiq8aAx2lwl6iw=; b=jIRgPmtDo9fbVDcU3vfQw3fkcMkegynBOjXVENASwn6JCJSxCTQis9vUblRgXXEKjp s4kiK/1/AhoFVQTCuipCbiTZkOAISO7z6x9tVWWYsijaLwtcTBI3fNioWkz9cd1kZSYp RYzPpTMV/B3J28KHQS25Ls2LVo9MC1QD2RYXzCO3BQG8l8mGKU/CnGZhK5T49m1j6cp2 3Sksv7CgBTFXHfhGni6HVk7pvL0YzMzPG8erWMdUYdj+CEIcexGm0q3hxTmBymJ3iyTw nxfWEsSvue+IeBcCFerbqRia80uOihKtDfLgMA6LDG937GDYP97RJ1jdhfR6kLVBz2C/ 0Q1g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=pKPr2ZrKD2Dgn/YQ+UA+eeMTgwQ7mCiq8aAx2lwl6iw=; b=kBDpLbzYMtWYbQpk9+BqOL5FFEj2TKvN6ic4DPBLWixZXu0KNbqaxZPh0+L1rU9cpp xSTkNCSFtottAz91NOyhhHszYG+vSdDGWJwRxETGarF+c5VpGzX448Ej/ESU3UdpIN1u aDBb7SCHdqVROmRHCs44Yt3PkmF6J4idxu2g8Adpq94o8E6knaG8ephaNqsFkx6EipTV Os7Z+1fpTTXU5ynhilAcda8x91U8Oxt3ETKGbyMqkiCqGRe4RJrm7uaDh02qPR1JyWDd w3QKvlV1BOCy4jzr40A1s/PbeXpqlZotVFcsLtXfz+0GOiTjLfdKkvw0P3+qNsLb2r4j QoZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJgeimMrUVrMKlTZ02ytrR6K94Jg0waeob6UhUVxoW7Ch4qnAUmoq4VmZyTesabvdM631HKm0KGci2AEPTU
X-Received: by 10.141.2.212 with SMTP id e203mr75084qhd.12.1466013854767; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.93.71 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 14:03:45 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iJYrdcFAk75y6fSmse_SdQ3SYaJvSHKTfR9KCBtq6bEcw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, John.Kaippallimalil@huawei.com, Liu Dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com>, mgrayson@cisco.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/4qR89tfWluU6ClThfraL2MztxXo>
Subject: [OPSAWG] Start of 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:04:17 -0000

Dear OpsAWG WG,

This begins a WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel - this WGLC
ends on June 29th.

This is the second WGLC for this document - it initially successfully
passed WGLC in August 2014
(https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg/current/msg03522.html)
and was handed to the IESG for publication in early September 2014.

After it was sent to the IESG (in Feb 2015) a very similar draft
appeared - draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp. We realized that
two, very similar documents, with significant overlap would be
confusing, and so we requested that
draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel be returned to the WG and asked
the authors to merge them into one document. There was some delays,
but this has finally been completed.

The WG is requested to review the document and provide (clear)
feedback on if you believe it is ready for publication. If not, please
provide suggestions for improvement / text.

Please note: Even if you said it was great on the first WGLC, it is
very useful to repeat this comment now!

W


-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf