Re: [OPSAWG] Rtgdir last call review of draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-13

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 12 December 2017 02:27 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 7C5B01270B4; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:27:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB3D128DF6; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:27:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lEsB2DrUQzdm; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:27:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x244.google.com (mail-pf0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22F611270B4; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:27:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x244.google.com with SMTP id m26so13065078pfj.11; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:27:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KdSM9V0eOvWuhbWJz2q9uc9beIwzeTjlxvoI7vAJdFg=; b=aLphYrUWa2J1KN3RtbOPTNF/rBaRn0TDzZU57Mfow7DZ2ISAOiSnZ1OFyPLQ9HeVBG 8FzisOVcLtGLNGGcBbkXkr2wnAe+jyL1671hgAlTLqcF3YlikFbX2kK0uZRpVueB7IPH gBZjGOhWA9TIyQihT89Sim21tfd85PLn8Wd/gouYDz4vgEFv1DlLffTfj87dj439M+1f KQ6frPU+LjONGLGzzr3NAus7AG+w1UqsVZjCJtlSbewWCHdF7o6NSBBlG2Xrx4pJ/1W2 BRo6TUJeSpWtxpv0/0rmlfg18aJHy4H/3rTKzRoeh7f1d7Y1Ye0V1kZdaB34S6Awco7A Whfg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KdSM9V0eOvWuhbWJz2q9uc9beIwzeTjlxvoI7vAJdFg=; b=i/jqIGwK8jKgSTOzZmUvd8S5SUb0qC2PQemX0ys/ck9sBmLnL6+Pnr2rQaD7FIl1Cc LI3e19wrg5XjBitwzXXLM1snDptvViqjZ7Uo0iofXw8BPLcrY3vsiMWRa26NmZvGQUQh dPVUCu+kKgwtdJ/LiyT64R+tcLRkBWaqyxAZ2856NRa2V57f7bIlwnueh6YE82xgbPwh H35d+O+sKy740CR3ShB1BPtayGYnXD6WaqK+EcXdNlJ0KEWgSLdECFDIvVaNEjaa0Sm0 FKfHh7xjJhX1wL1Fzvx6Ydjeokex4wl5QSnv5CX6K+C/dIPOsiuwykkI3KVgAVEmHQ1n ii5g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLEo0iuEGjRXUoOD7YDhIAt18FYMHnc7PTj4l7VLXpcuXoxksJm Fs73iveV5zfZcr3eCd1oxx5aLOd7NvMSjlYtsyg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouAtVB8xdDcp1NnPWNtCfil0kOD4m5qG6rGSNzVY9dP57fg54qtYqaD4rhpiYAa7rT9k1rrv7L4nbuGPKZqyHw=
X-Received: by 10.84.173.1 with SMTP id o1mr669630plb.135.1513045665712; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:27:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.186.208 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:27:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <151302958109.21278.5686525939396201959@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <151302958109.21278.5686525939396201959@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 21:27:05 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH5jPqUMwVU98L+kS4BN-YLh614G0r2g5qpScq+1NKQQMA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
Cc: rtg-dir@ietf.org, draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt.all@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Resent-From: alias-bounces@ietf.org
Resent-To: Kathleen.Moriarty@dell.com, acmorton@att.com, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, ekr@rtfm.com, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, warren@kumari.net, opsawg@ietf.org, paul.hoffman@vpnc.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20171212022748.7C5B01270B4@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:27:48 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/89TIkh9r7jmoQa9Q8LgMwDM-RKY>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Rtgdir last call review of draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-13
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 02:27:48 -0000

Ines,

Thank you very much for your review!  We're working on the comments
received and the nits you found will be addressed and are much
appreciated.

Best regards,
Kathleen

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Ines Robles
<mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review result: Ready
>
> RtgDir review: draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-13.txt
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
> Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as
> they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
> request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs.
> For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir
>
> Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would
> be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call
> comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by
> updating the draft.
>
> Document: Effect of Pervasive Encryption on Operators -
> draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-13 Reviewer: Ines Robles Review Date: 12-11-2017
> Intended status: Informational
>
> Summary:
> This document discusses current security and network management practices to
> help guide protocol development in support of manageable, secure networks.
>
> The draft is ready, few typos found.
>
> Comments:
>
> I believe the draft is technically good. This document is well written and
> clear to understand.
>
> Major Issues:
>
> No major issues found.
>
> Minor Issues:
>
> Section 2:
>
> "... Following the Snowden revelations,..." => It would be nice to add some
> references here
>
> Section 2.2.5:
> "DRM..."=> I would expand it to  Digital Rights Management (DRM)
>
> Section 6:
>
> inlcudes=> includes
>
> Section 6.1:
> "information For example" => period missing?
>
> Section 6.2:
> "soltuions" -> solutions
>
> Section 7.1 title:
> "Encypted" => Encrypted
>
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen