Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-01.txt

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Wed, 12 June 2019 02:57 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA76120071; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 19:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4MhOfgLDPOeU; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 19:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F488120059; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 19:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 0FC1CE417428C1952F34; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 03:57:04 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml709-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.58) by lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 03:57:03 +0100
Received: from lhreml709-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.58) by lhreml709-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.58) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 03:57:03 +0100
Received: from NKGEML411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.70) by lhreml709-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.58) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 03:57:03 +0100
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 10:55:15 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: H00725768 <hsong@futurewei.com>, "draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf.authors@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf.authors@ietf.org>
CC: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHVIIdkVhfTCkWAoUuIZ8gKelQfbKaXO/7g
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 02:55:14 +0000
Message-ID: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21BEE1E549@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <156027932152.30882.15275660565638019896@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156027932152.30882.15275660565638019896@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.156.116]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/8cK-RVS26xhpvTc9VH722qaPjmY>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-01.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 02:57:10 -0000

Hi Haoyu and the authors,

Thank you for the update on the NTF work. I see a lot of deep thinking wrt Telemetry.

I have some comments after a quick reading.
1. While I understand why you put the details on "Existing Works Mapped in the Framework" to Appendix A. I think the "Requirements and Challenges" for management plane, control plane, data plane, etc could be general and consistent. Maybe you can put those content in 4.2 or 4.4 or a separate section.

2. In Figure 6, I hope you can be more clear on the management column. YANG Push is a sub-pub extension to NETCONF. It's better to remove the "NETCONF" only.

3. In A.3.2.  Technique Taxonomy
I do not agree with your discussion on in-band and out-of-band. You may refer to rfc4778, 
2.2.  Device Management - In-Band and Out-of-Band (OOB)

4. Some nits:
iOAM->IOAM
Need expansion for IPFPM.
Internet of Things~(IoT) -> Internet of Things (IoT)


Tianran
> -----Original Message-----
> From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 2:55 AM
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
> Subject: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-01.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group
> WG of the IETF.
> 
>         Title           : Network Telemetry Framework
>         Authors         : Haoyu Song
>                           Fengwei Qin
>                           Pedro Martinez-Julia
>                           Laurent Ciavaglia
>                           Aijun Wang
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-01.txt
> 	Pages           : 33
> 	Date            : 2019-06-11
> 
> Abstract:
>    This document provides an architectural framework for network
>    telemetry to address the current and future network operation
>    challenges and requirements.  As evidenced by some key
>    characteristics and industry practices, network telemetry covers
>    technologies and protocols beyond the conventional network
>    Operations, Administration, and Management (OAM), so it promises
>    better flexibility, scalability, accuracy, coverage, and performance
>    and allows automated control loops to suit both today's and
>    tomorrow's network operation requirements.  This document clarifies
>    the terminologies and classifies the modules and components of a
>    network telemetry system.  The framework and taxonomy help to set a
>    common ground for the collection of related work and provide guidance
>    for future technique and standard developments.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf/
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-01
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-01
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-01
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg