IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] [Last-Call] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-9092-update-06

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 22 November 2023 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 029A0C14CE24; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 06:49:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U1FdCYqsIvQ8; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 06:49:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89570C14CE36; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 06:49:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dyas.sandelman.ca (dynamic-046-114-163-053.46.114.pool.telefonica.de [46.114.163.53]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3E051F951; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 14:49:06 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: relay.sandelman.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=sandelman.ca header.i=@sandelman.ca header.b="NB8w0qLh"; dkim-atps=neutral
Received: by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 92C62A1C20; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 15:48:50 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=dyas; t=1700664530; bh=kI5C9ql/u2CtQPQA9V+Jg9kA/V0mnusZiIAo+P+ouRM=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-reply-to:References:Date:From; b=NB8w0qLh6/LtjWfaYk+4ZCEcqvQtF7g5waU5w5nIC7w17vTwwoG6ySrmDGssDwwwx nv/TQeUN7gdh7bAzlBuPpJ1cIbNJKCQew6LFSR6tTkudsFYRey8D6jqxjT+v5vls7R 7YRTlwexx+XamzIVXM4V4OjokSjdQW+hJQUDvYow6S2evLBJUOkul9XvPN/+z1xxTS UFwSbhOn+u6TfWGkKVLANCVT3IZ1haYD8NuTFEVDMi7rk4DhWf31i4oVvY/itW2DD7 heQRjJ2D8JuAKMM/xAbZNQma7MJJXXM9NUPGsJAXdqOs//tU+k67X+WE30gx8XY3nv r2MgSdWWF4P0w==
Received: from dyas (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902A8A1C0E; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 15:48:50 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
cc: Sheng Jiang <shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn>, int-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsawg-9092-update.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <AA0B2969-C91E-4315-8D14-FAB94E55FF5D@vigilsec.com>
References: <170048020435.52580.12165403243448768390@ietfa.amsl.com> <AA0B2969-C91E-4315-8D14-FAB94E55FF5D@vigilsec.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> message dated "Mon, 20 Nov 2023 12:43:15 -0500."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 15:48:50 +0100
Message-ID: <248040.1700664530@dyas>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/99x8jcNlhjRivIr4Yboi4FWs2wI>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [Last-Call] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-9092-update-06
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 14:49:15 -0000

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
    > RFC 9092 includes a normative reference to RFC 8805.The shepherd
    > writeup for draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds (which eventually became
    > RFC 8805) calls out this downref.

    > The downward references were referenced in the Last Call:
    > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?q=draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds

    > At this point, RFC 5485 and RFC 8805 should have been added to the
    > downref registry; however I do not see either of them here
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/downref

Noted in shepherd report, which I'll post this week.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                      *I*LIKE*TRAINS*

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email