Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-08.txt

Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com> Tue, 20 March 2018 10:53 UTC

Return-Path: <jclarke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455FA126B6D for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 03:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id piPf9fO-kysW for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 03:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4A48126CD6 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 03:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1613; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1521543185; x=1522752785; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wSIedLBDhuo1UYbKK6cBF3sANMOQK4F3agLEGmnVlKc=; b=mH8wPpTUvwFWrx78CxMg1N+OXWdF5Gj9gwq5XOMQUBGB0UVabliCmcX3 PgWcb6tZrB3htxgaIkY7TDlrtvw0gWxZoBQz+QyuhDA0PiG9mg47hww+s mPz8RwVQVLYLpMiBktURvvr1VpZ15CEzgkeeBALCbeg/J0iMyntYic1Wd Y=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,335,1517875200"; d="scan'208";a="86063274"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Mar 2018 10:53:05 +0000
Received: from [10.82.240.10] (rtp-vpn2-10.cisco.com [10.82.240.10]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w2KAr4Mn003421; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:53:04 GMT
To: "Douglas Gash (dcmgash)" <dcmgash@cisco.com>, Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
References: <151905481837.18617.15913982011400739178@ietfa.amsl.com> <075DDE66-95C9-46B4-A47A-E313C39164D3@deployingradius.com> <CAB4uO_yk5f3He+hJkAoxNSD+LaZndfuGWvM1Es_wkY_XTB+bHg@mail.gmail.com> <DABB1B8E-0DD7-4D1C-84F7-16FADF730695@cisco.com> <6BBF4191-C4FD-4B43-90B1-2D3103507FC6@deployingradius.com> <5A542B8E-F32C-42FF-B725-2B2846A6496C@cisco.com>
From: Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com>
Organization: Cisco
Message-ID: <eeebb20c-b47d-fff4-4bf5-4055a54fbcd4@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 06:53:03 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5A542B8E-F32C-42FF-B725-2B2846A6496C@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/9PnPo2QD5VqeGTIJlkl4vc7voYA>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-08.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:53:07 -0000

On 3/20/18 06:19, Douglas Gash (dcmgash) wrote:
> Hi Alan,
> 
> Agreed. In the last cycle we looked to respond quickly to the comments, however, hit a blocker on upload of the resulting doc.
> 
> We will upload a new version with response to Joe’s comments from the 20 Feb this week, and start cadence of interaction with group to get the security section completed directly after.

Thank you, Douglas.

Joe

> 
> On 20/03/2018, 12:05, "Alan DeKok" <aland@deployingradius.com> wrote:
> 
>     
>     > On Mar 19, 2018, at 3:37 PM, Douglas Gash (dcmgash) <dcmgash@cisco.com> wrote:
>     > 
>     > Apologies for delay Alan, I have goofed with mail forwarding.
>     >  
>     > We still have some work to do on the security section. I will check to see which items we missed outside the security section, as I thought we had them all covered.
>     
>       The point is to *engage* with the working group.  Simply throwing a new draft "over the wall" periodically does not inspire confidence.
>     
>       On top of that, the Security Considerations still contains substantial amounts of my text, verbatim.  With no acknowledgement that this is the case.
>     
>       It would be good for the authors to engage with the WG to demonstrate that the document is ready.  The document has been shown repeatedly to be not ready for publication, with minimal engagement, feedback, or updates.
>     
>       Alan DeKok.
>     
>     
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>