Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-dahm-opsawg-tacacs-security-00.txt

heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> Wed, 29 June 2022 18:27 UTC

Return-Path: <heas@shrubbery.net>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95BEC14CF06 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id csSQY9TxHcFR for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sea.shrubbery.net (sea.shrubbery.net [129.250.47.99]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7062EC14CF04 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by sea.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 7053) id 6DDDB31C414; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 18:26:57 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 18:26:57 +0000
From: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
To: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Cc: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>, "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>, "Douglas Gash (dcmgash)" <dcmgash@cisco.com>, Andrej Ota <andrej@ota.si>, Thorsten Dahm <thorsten.dahm@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <YryZcYAjzaUr/Er1@shrubbery.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-PGPkey: http://www.shrubbery.net/~heas/public-key.asc
X-note: live free, or die!
X-homer: i just want to have a beer while i am caring.
X-Claimation: an engineer needs a manager like a fish needs a bicycle
X-reality: only YOU can put an end to the embarrassment that is Tom Cruise
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/A4s_TOFIoe9YPcT4FYzEILRtanU>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-dahm-opsawg-tacacs-security-00.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 18:27:12 -0000

> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>  
>  
>         Title           : TACACS+ Security and SSH Public Keys
>         Authors         : Thorsten Dahm
>                           Douglas Gash
>                           Andrej Ota
>                           John Heasley
>         Filename        : draft-dahm-opsawg-tacacs-security-00.txt
>         Pages           : 14
>         Date            : 2022-06-02
>  
> Abstract:
>    The TACACS+ Protocol [RFC8907] provides device administration for
>    routers, network access servers and other networked computing devices
>    via one or more centralized servers.  This document, a companion to
>    the TACACS+ protocol [RFC8907], adds new packet formats to improve
>    security and function and support for SSH [RFC4716] public keys.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dahm-opsawg-tacacs-security/
>  
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-dahm-opsawg-tacacs-security-00.html


We have received no comments about this draft, which I presume means no
technical objections exist.  So, I would like to ask the Chairs for an
adoption call.