Re: [OPSAWG] opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel
Mahesh Govind <vu3mmg@gmail.com> Mon, 25 April 2016 13:28 UTC
Return-Path: <vu3mmg@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D321B12D519 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 06:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id urHtYr3W4UAu for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 06:28:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x230.google.com (mail-lf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FF7112D501 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 06:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id y84so18896573lfc.0 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 06:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=ZbDzP5p/JZIN3wBynV6GQe5fOW5N1Wup5hr+lASJT3M=; b=y4RYaX7xP73W0KttNXn3SXp8odQj7zGJtiSZWsf54utRnhtBeS8WwuQU9WKPy5cLlp haM39Kahs7n5o0Slr+QtfG7uty+mc4cWOo6bLNx2q7Tpxrnn9ZFJbdocQbAQ8cxZPueH S+rqGSkLH1mSLPJVIIMsfYsaYJ0bBnVrBSO/bw1ToHXKa2IPcQHUMQzPN4hrXFL+e+zf 4iHwcru3SwLjrzSUY17Covc0oNK59Bz3ymRH2hS38ydd7uHPDchJoZaeOn0VJVW5mB+4 joQZiNv342jBsUD6DxA/3D3U5X3vPb+9APSJi60hxjhDgUOi6Ot4RnLCpYz6xPXR0olh zJlw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=ZbDzP5p/JZIN3wBynV6GQe5fOW5N1Wup5hr+lASJT3M=; b=cW/pStbL1AjNfO1OO6v2PcNzdD81VA+C2+W5Y+RswcRl+Npe4QPbAQWogfk25gTVOC Vk0OrhHoaZVlPCwfcR7+QiNHHvl5JGbbADsF5aAPgWXhSU8+8mWIP9rsE5F2JqhNO1zo YX7uxRDG9yg/yRrH0M5XzlJeyELM637ZzMfVdpFuz6/BKYTpoqwk4G45XV3q1vWlQjS3 0oo87uCNG8Nh3ek0wTBdkOfvl9cjUW4NMARSn9MFfg6gCtRe3Ba9SHi/oEljvRwEG6JT SdWFh+b1GMQ+tThNPO8frJQXpUvh2O4JBIIJHIujfXaFgDE+z7dnHBOi74h3qCWlT/yE SnAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUE6qirVHwsKH7e8shNg/D86G/nQgDfm075nwxLjXgYQNWZmKIFhUigysA4bTQpl702p+NV/kSUD+/GgQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.166.140 with SMTP id p134mr11847715lfe.29.1461590928194; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 06:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.69.179 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 06:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPW0HRq_RDurO_9W_pWC58yX9wERC60RnJS00xuqjizWt3JUDQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPW0HRpvMJr8BG2LxcNLjGC3Rvpv3sDqVKF+LcKzBDJuCOTcuw@mail.gmail.com> <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F2183BAEBD7@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CAPW0HRp9Bh9i3SCkWh1Y1-VTnhPqy6w_GmqG_FV0ojj5hCuEoQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPW0HRq_RDurO_9W_pWC58yX9wERC60RnJS00xuqjizWt3JUDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 18:58:48 +0530
Message-ID: <CAPW0HRp2k1XeCGXBwKj5H5fZt2yDK1sbOn7TZwdVkGYzSTALdw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mahesh Govind <vu3mmg@gmail.com>
To: Zhoutianran <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, opsawg@ietf.org, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114118c61502a905314f2889"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/BQcGyvzJG0UASvpvUzZdydNZvk0>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:28:59 -0000
Hi All, Any info about the adoption of alt-tunneling will be helpful . regards Mahesh On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Mahesh Govind <vu3mmg@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Tianran, > Thanks for the reply . > > I am implementing capwap in opendaylight . > https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:CAPWAP > > Already pushing a good amount of code . Alternate tunneling seems to be a > good choice for me . > If there is acceptance for alt-tunneling , I could implement the draft in > ODL . > > Thanks in advance for any kind of support . > > regards > Mahesh > > > >> >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 6:48 AM, Zhoutianran <zhoutianran@huawei.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Mahesh, >>> >>> >>> >>> You have this question in the mailing list. >>> >>> I think it would be helpful to get a concrete answer if you can also >>> give a reason why you want to know this. >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Tianran >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Mahesh >>> Govind >>> *Sent:* Saturday, April 23, 2016 1:49 AM >>> *To:* opsawg@ietf.org >>> *Subject:* [OPSAWG] opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> Could you please let me know whether any one has implemented the draft ( >>> opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel >>> <https://tools.ietf.org/wg/opsawg/draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel/> >>> ) >>> >>> >>> >>> regards >>> >>> Mahesh >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
- [OPSAWG] opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel Mahesh Govind
- Re: [OPSAWG] opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel Mahesh Govind
- Re: [OPSAWG] opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel Mahesh Govind