Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-vishwakarma-opsawg-ssh-cert-radius-02.txt
Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Fri, 31 December 2021 18:17 UTC
Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E1A3A0B59 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 10:17:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OQO4Fp5O_e-G for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 10:17:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCA873A0B57 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 10:17:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (24-52-251-6.cable.teksavvy.com [24.52.251.6]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A28E9389; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 18:17:18 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.20.0.1.32\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR0701MB7022849578DBEE6135CEED6CCE469@VI1PR0701MB7022.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 13:17:17 -0500
Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <45E9B2EF-A892-4B56-8A3B-43986FCEB51C@deployingradius.com>
References: <164071924247.20775.17467590125210359851@ietfa.amsl.com> <VI1PR0701MB7022849578DBEE6135CEED6CCE469@VI1PR0701MB7022.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: tom petch <ietfid@btconnect.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.20.0.1.32)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/Cc7ChMxyLoWIMZh-dkZizGBaVok>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-vishwakarma-opsawg-ssh-cert-radius-02.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 18:17:30 -0000
On Dec 31, 2021, at 11:34 AM, tom petch <ietfid@btconnect.com> wrote: > <tp> > With one Normative Reference for RADIUS, one Normative Reference for TLS, one Normative Reference for EAP and two for SSH, I wonder which WG is best equipped to review this; curdle? Previous discussion from November 2020: https://www.mail-archive.com/search?q=ssh-cert&l=opsawg%40ietf.org On a quick scan, it looks like many of the issues raised for the -00 version aren't addressed in the -02 version. This proposal is really "EAP over SSH", and is not strictly tied to certificates. We also have an existing spec, and code, to do pretty much this: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7055 and https://moonshot-wiki.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/HOME/overview?mode=global Alan DeKok.