Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption call for draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-09

[Benoit Claise <[e-mail]>]

Dear all,

After reviewing themeeting minutes 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-106-opsawg/>, I was a little 
bit puzzled. From my recollection, Joe and Frank had some good feedback 
on the draft.
Also, in the minutes, I did not see any mention of Joe's feedback. And 
Frank's feedback on the draft is summarized as 4 words: "the scope is large"
So I went back and reviewed the youtube video 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY-u8177wpU>.

I support Frank's feedback that this document scope is too large: a mix 
of an inventory of what exists, a set of requirements, and 
specifications/framework. I'm wondering: what is the scope of this 
document? Before we clarify this, I don't think we should adopt this 
document.

The OPSAWG chair questions at the end of the presentation were:

	Chair: How many of you have read this document? quite a lot.
	Chair: How many of you think this is a useful work and the working group could
	work on it? still many, 20+.

I was waiting for the negative question but to my surprise, it never came...

	Chair: How many of you don't think ...

If that question would have been asked, I would have come to mic. or at 
least raised my hand.

It's important to make a distinction between the interest to solve those 
problems (I believe we have full agreement) and whether this document is 
a good starting point. I object to the latter, with the document in the 
current form.

Regards, Benoit
>
> Hi WG,
>
> On IETF 106 meeting, wesaw predominant interest and support to this 
> draft, especially from operators. The authors then resolved all the 
> open issues.
>
> As requested by the authors, this email starts a 2 weeks working group 
> adoption call for draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-09.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework/
>
> If you support adopting this document please say so, and please give 
> an indication of why you think it is important. Also please say if you 
> will be willing to review and help the draft.
>
> If you do not support adopting this document as a starting point to 
> work on, please say why.
>
> This poll will run until Dec 23..
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tianran as co-chair
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg