IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] Call for adoption, draft-asai-vmm-mib

Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com> Wed, 30 October 2013 23:38 UTC

Return-Path: <victor@jvknet.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C9B21E8173 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6PwzYtB1netp for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120CA21E8143 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id q58so1977860wes.17 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=QknqHyepmoqtIx8dypzIWHtFQqmPcQZHdVU964uDMYE=; b=PjbNjyKOTQu67czrJqzUWDdYuOd5QLbCwjbmB7Go4asNSxmvbSFw3cdyD7jFPx9TFo XDZqDGroA9vf7MSD32DCiku2EsUtrNwtKfUqOeNBB5eeiKqTq+5rYukPOMIR7+bNfjIp dy4HHZVD1cFS3ei71RNuJeIPd6wmEwHoaScNFpAbGmN5NHWMcf6/mjg7yoQMWWBZeaRE ZErH25KhfieehGsKhmQg+vUk+E9LC6fQa5N12JqDR2DE5RRBIQpwdyRMYyA8G6HKWpJ2 f2Kq2/CHskvNHlWOp8OrUHjh927uU1mD7gW62Io1Vnu+awzSDlpGUVXrjNAGQjZ6+kdj lZdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkSmHO0ulxbA7czkx84xjHouDIO3ZuQlSjJLX1rEyCK1+BT0tkvueEhK7x8YAk7qxTDsYdG
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.185.130 with SMTP id fc2mr4128758wic.43.1383176288994; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.240.6 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <52708BD2.6010209@gmail.com>
References: <52708BD2.6010209@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:38:08 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJc3aaMSoRu1CHH8TL+cwpMKMShtv4bhwyO3L2h11WpOMWcdBg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c350da5e1bce04e9fdd393"
Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for adoption, draft-asai-vmm-mib
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 23:38:34 -0000

Melinda,

I have also reviewed [most] the document and also support it adoption.  I
did not complete a very detailed review (yet) of section 3.3's definition.

Reasons for support
(1). Document addresses area of operational concern (management of virtual
machines)
(2). Based on updates even from last version (-04), the authors have put in
significant work to mature draft content and text
(3). This is also a good time to get an expanded set of eyes to review
content (i.e. OID structure and MIB definitions) and verify content is
complete (appears so)


regards,

Victor K




On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>wrote:

> We are starting a call for working group adoption of
> "Management Information Base for Virtual Machines Controlled
> by a Hypervisor," https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-asai-vmm-mib/.
> This document has received extensive discussion on the opsawg
> mailing list and is on its 5th revision, and we believe it meets
> the criteria for consideration for adoption laid out by
> Benoit at IETF 86:
>
>         1. reach out to other people for review,
>         2. potentially put the bar higher for WG adoption
>         3. solicit reviews from chairs and AD
>         4. if no feedback, kill it. Demonstrate support.
>
> We've also allowed some time for discussion during the
> meeting session next Tuesday.
>
> We will be assessing consensus on Wednesday, 13 November.
> Please review the current version of the document, let us
> know whether or not you support adoption, and raise any
> issues you've identified.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Melinda, Scott, Warren
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email