Re: [OPSAWG] side meeting #119: Power Metrics: concrete usage example

Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@gmail.com> Mon, 25 March 2024 12:00 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB43C14F6F2; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 05:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5aF76BIrM-9X; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 05:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x529.google.com (mail-ed1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::529]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF1FCC14F6F1; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 05:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x529.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-56c0a249bacso1283398a12.1; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 05:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1711368048; x=1711972848; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pDp+HJg4hz8zf5vaewMJY8aKtuRqMJQ5ynGi4GI4tPk=; b=mZAfy4706PmRgLxw9CbqYAJVuoZd+uQ1ReD8bEISMCgFxmv4L4/NXFY//vYBgaD5Nh Wjq+uJgeFvkKxkhTrGRBmgobCoJaax64/F0gFq1wd1RRinNGrbW0CbmMHozUrZWWXhf4 mF2qrVZ4yVUj2fUaN1Vz0H1n8pgiShYHZ1EletkeDdqtxwqvIExUKcvXLlIwT3rJ1kFn JrRQ2pFr218vJ1a+ha+L/ou05a7RrsgovhjwzYdMu3g1ufkhQuThjM6mScA+9ev6gKpn BqEnipV1vwXQXoVwZjoyNmZHy9NqqcsaxmIY+MHRuv3AfPlfpnjrUpd/uIMHiwdRUtAA 6OCg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711368048; x=1711972848; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=pDp+HJg4hz8zf5vaewMJY8aKtuRqMJQ5ynGi4GI4tPk=; b=Srozysan8VJbHetQc2c6Q9GEiTHZnQsFDDpF1gT6I228avalU0dTJWp69TOiLcHCDs 72EAiLBryhW9qvNMTnc9fa0RtY2aMtL/CBicA7/DRfKSFkOPAt3FHC6uJBCFCvLeXPTe uyquATCAJgMD/5hGtkQYU83wOo4lTlj/3LexgoFjL8N2BLqtqUR2ofU6NYPgCvyn8389 mcH7MEfuXVW4qdwU95KIsjKmAhYVbgQ6jkJLY2AINkqeWsTdFGbh7D3KjSdc9F+C7En7 BCwjuaDmw/v9ghLRhvIZtkEIjDOtV6eiP2B1vQqdrWmt4pk+LEPNtPpwk/hR8tza1Vv/ LsRg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXnBaQD0Z11WyaCRoAvA051PEBnysZi+haLsEm9f5CVQXrg9qOMM8RDdTZqihN+n/wqxObO/uoDtAaIJoSBr0tU9t9qLR7HxZHHaWh6K3q4qhzBLZ4dPW/IYsM=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxft02BabReZwXC5Yw/tyaZgZYvQLtwtAV0gQi6hNm+SweluTyc 9Er+u8d2lmo90/YspSITxEnSpaAnOCqMYBm3kgYkw/PPxA6Ugsekx+U8qcr4Bckkldj9kcvRkNX Ipk+BoEAg9kTNWHbk8wlvOrc3XEw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGku2vOGFcF7Bvo7o++b14HonLjw60vy/T5TybyiRqBIzXEIFnllQV9fc/tjybWipvLNm4tGcwh6VomIWle7ho=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3b58:b0:a45:ad29:725c with SMTP id h24-20020a1709063b5800b00a45ad29725cmr4492201ejf.62.1711368047826; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 05:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DM4PR11MB52778685A92225856D21BB16C5282@DM4PR11MB5277.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM4PR11MB52778685A92225856D21BB16C5282@DM4PR11MB5277.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 08:00:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CACe62Mnii4FMwkYAtvDHPEriy_BmEx4MtLtte1s1KKxFShJHZg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Marisol Palmero Amador (mpalmero)" <mpalmero=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, "e-impact@ietf.org" <e-impact@ietf.org>, "inventory-yang@ietf.org" <inventory-yang@ietf.org>, Alexander Clemm <alex@clemm.org>, "Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)" <natal@cisco.com>, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, "Ali Rezaki (Nokia)" <ali.rezaki@nokia.com>, "Suresh Krishnan (sureshk)" <sureshk@cisco.com>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009220e706147aec19"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/HRujRWpAfXLTy8gNv8s_YML25aE>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] side meeting #119: Power Metrics: concrete usage example
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 12:00:50 -0000

+Jari

Hello,

*Suresh, Jari,*

I'm confused by this bullet point:

*•              next steps? E.g. WG coordination/status, form a WG Design
Team, call for a BOF?*

Could you please clarify?

I understood there's no WG (and hence no WG coordination nor status), in
favor of the IAB Program. There cannot be a WG Design Team without a WG. I
cannot find "design team" or 'BOF" (WG forming or not?) in the minutes of
eimpact meetings <https://datatracker.ietf.org/program/eimpact/meetings/>,
maybe I missed it.

Is this an effort parallel to eimpact or a shadow meeting?

*Poweff authors,*

Is Poweff still a Cisco-only effort, as recorded in
https://youtu.be/m4vpThE5K9c?feature=shared&t=3534? Verbatim youtube
transcript:

*Many of the um products uh that we have uh mainly in Cisco right we are
still looking into multivendor and this will be really good for um the
participants to um provide feedback how this H um standardization of the
data model might impact in your network equipment but um*


Thanks!

Carlos.

On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 1:30 PM Marisol Palmero Amador (mpalmero) <mpalmero=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
>
>
> We have booked a side meeting in Brisbone,  IETF #119
>
> *Thursday 9:00 am local time*.
>
> *Headline*: Power Metrics: concrete usage example
>
>
>
>
>
> Please see the *agenda* that we are proposing:
>
>
>
> •              Overview of ongoing sustainability work in IETF (everyone
> contributes)
>
> •              Brief presentation of sustainability insights/poweff
> updates, incl. look at a more concrete example
>
> •              Any other short updates?
>
> •              next steps? E.g. WG coordination/status, form a WG Design
> Team, call for a BOF?
>
>
>
>
>
> As we would like to leave time to discuss and review **next steps**, for
> the overview we propose not more than 20 min.
>
> As authors from specific drafts, please let me know which draft(s) you
> would like to review, we would like to make sure that we could fit them
> into the 20 min
>
>
>
> Safe travels, and have a nice weekend
>
>
>
> Marisol Palmero, on behalf of the authors of sustainability insights&
> poweff drafts
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>