IETF Logo Mail Archive

[OPSAWG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lear-opsawg-sbom-access-00.txt

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 13 October 2020 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8D13A1074 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EW1HiYmB-Rkm for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 653D43A00C9 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8559; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1602618976; x=1603828576; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:references:to:date; bh=lwlkKsz1VgnReboq2kx/8XR28gHkJT8qoUx6/0dM0ls=; b=ZQV8ZiCaqMi0r9fYeKzK2eKPb5Njfp5GR2AZMDM30CzuvNl/9qd4waUT QxxWfhxKWn9RD/LLIy3c9DH4/m/TgEt0P9YNycIeMtoNdiWzUhi022hkV wtEmGIyEdIq9+FYlPUjwAi1vsGnNlFnZvSLro1cgEW2ScjNlXwioARSPZ 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AbAAAxBYZf/xbLJq1gGwEBAQEBAQEBBQEBARIBAQEDAwEBAUCBPQQBAQELAYMZVQEgEiyNP4dyJpQMhh2BfQsBAQENAQEjDAQBAYFVgnUCggMmNgcOAgMBAQsBAQUBAQECAQYEbYVcDIVyAQECAgF3BwscAwECKAdGBwIIBhODJgGCXCAPp1Z0gTSEPwIOQUSFAYE4AYwXgTmCAIERJwwQgX1QPoJcAQECAQGBE2gWgxSCLQSadZxugnODFYVtkWgDH4MVgSqIXoUZjweeF5FVg2ACBAYFAhWBQRoGLYFXMxoIGxUaSwGCPgk1EhkNlySFRD8DMAI1AgYKAQEDCYwTgjUBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.77,371,1596499200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="30324963"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 13 Oct 2020 19:56:12 +0000
Received: from [10.61.221.162] ([10.61.221.162]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 09DJuAgI020085 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 19:56:11 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5580A3F3-A3E2-45C3-98BC-4BFFFBCB5A4B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Message-Id: <5A6BF999-4422-47B7-A96B-4C0ACFF6CDD7@cisco.com>
References: <160260371149.16976.435024798941804386@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 21:56:08 +0200
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.221.162, [10.61.221.162]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/K03oMrCy9tH_y9bKF8N379vJE-Q>
Subject: [OPSAWG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lear-opsawg-sbom-access-00.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 19:56:19 -0000

This is the same draft that was presented some time ago to you.  However, the emphasis is changed- MUD is not the sole means by which an SBOM can be discovered.  The context will matter.

My request is that we discuss this in the WG, and then consider it for adoption, understanding that it has a bit of a road to travel still.

Eliot

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>>
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-lear-opsawg-sbom-access-00.txt
> Date: 13 October 2020 at 17:41:51 CEST
> To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com <mailto:lear@cisco.com>>, Scott Rose <scott.rose@nist.gov <mailto:scott.rose@nist.gov>>
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-lear-opsawg-sbom-access-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Eliot Lear and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:		draft-lear-opsawg-sbom-access
> Revision:	00
> Title:		Discovering And Accessing Software Bills of Materials
> Document date:	2020-10-13
> Group:		Individual Submission
> Pages:		15
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-lear-opsawg-sbom-access-00.txt <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-lear-opsawg-sbom-access-00.txt>
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lear-opsawg-sbom-access/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lear-opsawg-sbom-access/>
> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lear-opsawg-sbom-access <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lear-opsawg-sbom-access>
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lear-opsawg-sbom-access-00 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lear-opsawg-sbom-access-00>
> 
> 
> Abstract:
>   Software bills of materials (SBOMs) are formal descriptions of what
>   pieces of software are included in a product.  This memo specifies a
>   different means for SBOMs to be retrieved.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org <http://tools.ietf.org/>.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email