Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Last Call for draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-07
tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com> Thu, 13 October 2022 06:57 UTC
Return-Path: <kondtir@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6D4C1524D9; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 23:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dr4hKscneliF; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 23:57:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B461C1522C7; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 23:57:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id b1so1072369lfs.7; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 23:57:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tYnm2Oew23nRfUJysz7K5lFLcdQlZyyvkEpklKsvTzE=; b=L0kzr0UKi5jSV54kWtC0p47+IZ+tC24TyUwERVZgN+Q8f+dXkQbI3yG6HwbqoC8qEO CAb9Dyx008OSHR2bYXCcgGF8kc26xFWBoujZeD7WZB4075xPU56GG56f7I4GTkj65o2L gyzAJqNfhP5qBJs4kdB4HMvgcTwLruL44ua7SuXz58UwkoAyI/0Oj4AlpNtM1mpiKGzX IqNOC7Nrq8E9bp2Saus8hdWSB1zDiYFtSnCPjMvrSQDF4L05IrDV/OA9HbIyDStDA6eV sa9OLXZcK+LC0Ej8+aMcPvY2d2H973DqQ4YAcCZZkY0szmiSkKRQDyJdCRf+0l3zTABk Ksjg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=tYnm2Oew23nRfUJysz7K5lFLcdQlZyyvkEpklKsvTzE=; b=v5e93UiozIvpySwSOeBh18kSHl8wQAXSDOvQsAY6rCpb+SkLz7Ah6fTynM25pctxBP XSK0gDIFATUtMGVc47OSJc/5s7kOMncMVmrw49Lg5f8K9+jqeNncUP2qnTGnn2JXq9Yf 098zX7TVNxpse9uaDw3kpT50R0wkdAbF9ggwqJqxpaghR00avGHl9B1ci/KnUCp/G+hC uUOGdJxHmshL+rm5hSBkDg+h2/4iNoTlKRpbe4LBQzBgAkTbs4+2tGtzlpa3H9RVAom1 NzroYY9Mp4PTLbNmfbg22P9K2+WSotkEhILa2zX3f6oNKSaEIh2KA6ut6i4Smo/tmRsQ tqxw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2PzlTW91IWDuFHyeEKYQdYZYuNMXiObYK4TWSG0BGj9bY1bBYN PIdK4k5PB8gvPG9Y//WUfUAwGRKxxojKf2mT9Mc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5wiGcu2eufcWtlFv+ZxKfh1vOmqDcv0V7LNiSAeJWqqgOBPcFeNLWbYBK0x8KdyI2nOkMHP8hPXJHyTj51xJg=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5edc:0:b0:4a4:5923:5172 with SMTP id d28-20020ac25edc000000b004a459235172mr650093lfq.330.1665644258654; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 23:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3786da98-9541-a50c-eb2e-aa2647014bf9@sit.fraunhofer.de> <ecf96fde-b6e3-c984-91c0-e35c3d5d3997@sit.fraunhofer.de> <7a59c0ab-fc7b-9dd6-84b3-3778ec68dcd6@sit.fraunhofer.de> <AM7PR07MB6248F06ECE85C8D4BF421195A0229@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <b60a12b4-85dc-6004-067e-040298d2aa49@sit.fraunhofer.de>
In-Reply-To: <b60a12b4-85dc-6004-067e-040298d2aa49@sit.fraunhofer.de>
From: tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 12:27:27 +0530
Message-ID: <CAFpG3gd+DcUs=ZPij-Ckn0e8ED_iyvYd-T2gqiH2uwXtF592Sg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls@ietf.org>, Thomas Fossati <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005bfe7505eae50629"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/K3Aq-ewTrqoBma9aONS4Ft_Pw8E>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Last Call for draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-07
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 06:57:45 -0000
Thanks Tom for the review. Yes, we will fix the references identified by Tom. Cheers, -Tiru On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 18:37, Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > Hi Tom, > > would it be possible for you to augment your first comment with change > proposals, if possible? > > @authors: it seems to me that the references issues Tom now provided in > specific detail could be resolved in this thread in a timely manner. Is > that correct? > > Viele Grüße, > > Henk > > On 12.10.22 13:39, tom petch wrote: > > From: OPSAWG <opsawg-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Henk Birkholz < > henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de> > > Sent: 06 October 2022 13:26 > > > > Dear authors and contributors, > > > > thank you for your hard work. As it seems that all existing issues have > > been resolve, we'll move the I-D to write-up in the datatracker. > > > > Also, thanks Thomas Fossati for stepping up as shepherd! > > > > <tp> > > My main comment on this remains the mix of two different YANG modules > with different life cycles; I expect that l will comment again on the Last > Call list to give this issue more exposure. > > > > Of lesser import, I cannot make sense of the references. > > I see [RFC5246] which normally means that a reference has been created. > Not here, so there would seem to have been some chicanery involved, that > this I-D has not been produced by the usual IETF tools. > > > > I also see RFC5869, RFC6346, RFC8447 which seem absent from the I-D > References. > > > > dtls13 is now an RFC. > > > > What is the difference between > > draft-ietf-tls-dtls13: > > and > > "RFC DDDD: Datagram Transport Layer Security 1.3"; > > ? > > How do I find > > "RFC CCCC: Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography"; > > or > > "RFC IIII: Common YANG Data Types for Hash algorithms"; ? > > > > Does tls-1-2 mean the same as tls-1.2? And is this the same as that > which the Netconf WG refers to as tls12? > > > > Tom Petch > > > > > > For the OPSAWG co-chairs, > > > > Henk > > > > > > On 29.09.22 10:27, Henk Birkholz wrote: > >> Dear OPSAWG members, > >> > >> this email concludes the first WGLC call for > >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-07.html. > >> > >> A few comments where raised. Authors/editors, please go ahead and > >> address these as discussed on the list. > >> > >> > >> For the OPSAWG co-chairs, > >> > >> Henk > >> > >> On 14.09.22 16:07, Henk Birkholz wrote: > >>> Dear OPSAWG members, > >>> > >>> this email starts a two week period for a Working Group Last Call of > >>> > >>>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-07.html > >>> > >>> ending on Thursday, September 28th. > >>> > >>> The authors believe the Internet-Draft is ready for a WGLC and the > >>> chairs agree. The draft has been discussed visibly at IETF 114 and > >>> review feedback has been incorporated in -07. > >>> > >>> Please send your comments to the list and your assessment of whether > >>> or not it is ready to proceed to publication before September 28th. > >>> > >>> > >>> For the OPSAWG co-chairs, > >>> > >>> Henk > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OPSAWG mailing list > >> OPSAWG@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OPSAWG mailing list > > OPSAWG@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg >
- [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Last Call for draft-ietf-opsawg-mud… Henk Birkholz
- Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Last Call for draft-ietf-opsawg… tom petch
- Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Last Call for draft-ietf-opsawg… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Last Call for draft-ietf-opsawg… tom petch
- Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Last Call for draft-ietf-opsawg… tirumal reddy
- Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Last Call for draft-ietf-opsawg… Henk Birkholz
- Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Last Call for draft-ietf-opsawg… Henk Birkholz
- [OPSAWG] 🔔 WGLC and Shepherd write-up concluded f… Henk Birkholz
- Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Last Call for draft-ietf-opsawg… tom petch
- Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Last Call for draft-ietf-opsawg… Henk Birkholz
- Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Last Call for draft-ietf-opsawg… tirumal reddy
- Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Last Call for draft-ietf-opsawg… tom petch
- Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Last Call for draft-ietf-opsawg… tom petch
- Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Last Call for draft-ietf-opsawg… tirumal reddy
- Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WGLC and Shepherd write-up conclud… Henk Birkholz
- Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Last Call for draft-ietf-opsawg… tom petch
- Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Last Call for draft-ietf-opsawg… tirumal reddy
- Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Last Call for draft-ietf-opsawg… tom petch
- Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Last Call for draft-ietf-opsawg… tirumal reddy