Re: [OPSAWG] IPR poll on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 16 March 2017 13:25 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4695D1294E0; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5YJ1x8IsQPAM; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x236.google.com (mail-qt0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 292DE1294D1; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x236.google.com with SMTP id i34so37274830qtc.0; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=RjKtEzFTsGoj0HeGv/yh0/zr2yh4cqOijLPX31adHfU=; b=SFmw0nqgdtSYjymoEIiWWv99XcC10NjnzwrCNM1ycTcWTxI7ocvwfQp8TJTyJHvTol yA03f5EoUWaLsk+j47fTWEaYk8cp+7bRz0m9EfHAUAtt+uN9Zn7bnWRwbCLL2I5Bmc3f 1H8eWgCVjX7r+3zM2c3pCgwm3qwYyouc7Y2Bg0XH+d3kscPMqEvpvfDq7awJTojtyOEU F7+sNoQbp4ogzSB6FKjCvYN/EZevVr/KuYCf5Qu76n2oIblmlUI39KgU70RhqggBUtjf Tj/gmcDT2Quq5ZWNQ3OMPkCHlcI8dTC5lQcH167YWVPlNmnPlTQ9J9RwxdJ7UQ0FgmEz Y8DQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=RjKtEzFTsGoj0HeGv/yh0/zr2yh4cqOijLPX31adHfU=; b=qomil5AP+bWVg+d9OG8E45gUggm4BWB49+2OWrHebDsVYRaC37ueUBFkZhfc/gQKae +zCNAxWRMqMcqpssjdY/avn7nPW9YgMoj2HXwTslI7afc2ff3KD3Ph2xZ+YonVNeBUdG T1c6UrSC6zqBVDde/67Y/WW/gY1WHMV+MWnf9llk6sA0hMTY162uLbszWc2r2BEKveEj upYocz/NZWPUYhhH2x7xm4npbYBtXWoVaJ/9euLgRBOt1/7Eicij2ozA4O9HTBauSY6j n3I9PcpWjbul5ZGCcZMWX5huTvi051SYdP0DEQLB1jqo94OcoZbvNKkwQ91EPWDoKHK+ FtpQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3uFbNUnnyzOwNwHBdEskbEqNJ57JMPOcjqBb26YOh8qww6EqXyL+Im9BoFX8190Q==
X-Received: by 10.200.0.25 with SMTP id a25mr7605004qtg.199.1489670700213; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18f:801:600:50fe:ca08:ce27:17bc? ([2601:18f:801:600:50fe:ca08:ce27:17bc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 14sm2861362qtp.29.2017.03.16.06.24.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <3C186480-4E25-4346-A981-59EAFA4BE255@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_43F98ECB-9CDF-4626-824C-4ADD71E2A229"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:24:52 -0400
In-Reply-To: <5f893178-dcfc-1881-99d2-3fdc7eaeccb1@cisco.com>
Cc: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, "opsawg-chairs@ietf.org" <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>
To: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
References: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21A22E1363@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com> <5f893178-dcfc-1881-99d2-3fdc7eaeccb1@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/RB3Emwblw9_daLECjnnYTrOTWDE>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] IPR poll on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 13:25:03 -0000

I am not personally aware of any IPR claims that apply to draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05.txt.

- Ralph

> 
> From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
> Subject: [OPSAWG] IPR poll on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05
> Date: March 14, 2017 at 9:24:32 PM EDT
> To: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
> Cc: "opsawg-chairs@ietf.org" <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>
> 
> 
> Dear WG Members,
> 
> We are currently preparing draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05 for working group last call. Here is an IPR poll prior to the wglc.
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05.txt? 
> 
> If you own or are aware of any IPR that applies to the draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05 please clarify whether this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email in OPSAWG mailing list regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.
> 
> If you are not listed as an author or contributor but are on OPSAWG mailing list, then please explicitly respond if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> 
> Thank you for kind support.
> 
> Regards,
> Tianran / OPSAWG Co-Chair
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
> 
> 
>