IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR poll on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Wed, 15 March 2017 09:10 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDCAA129962 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 02:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e8yqNo4fyBgQ for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 02:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22f.google.com (mail-qk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 495B1129968 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 02:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 1so7741398qkl.3 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 02:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hDcStE6TX1D3Y4TkppTjWDiEeck8jqOLBELmND/Pjp0=; b=lSxGZ4PuNSHSOMCIgPIe3YHOZoBFJkv0bJZjIqzqoyU4Oqw7adDlblvNEht9eaBeTq BKP5K7d2xNQ/ZvTTBiTjRb7cOqCgmFmgwc3wTEPRcfI6HSSgTrp1+SjHRFxQFN5Bwkpk JDnxEq1VZuzjnrYvcs8C6qildF23tbFYH8D2sFpvUHNaogD5Gh7hHMSrzn/TMLNfIcSb qLzqafY0Qd2TmcHW/9l8iz5ecmD6mDEVf9FSh+Y7GKeHS2waIFHKVaZe6wfooGJLCbDt 6rbRYQaeEE71pUZqvp5VPSxMVQ/eMUADTYLfRRIeNlhar64LuAOle3H5wj++k0E58KaA Rk2Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hDcStE6TX1D3Y4TkppTjWDiEeck8jqOLBELmND/Pjp0=; b=gnEAtXdyRSu366vpQ0o0ifLCFm/mUBM595dk/Z8NGpcE0Mm+Hc8f38XWEqZWUDRXK2 MruWsyhEwHefMuDnpe4aEyUJHWSG8V9zw0giKwi/AJOt8jNC8IPqnJ9NYmiP+Qp5y+Dm Eaa8/5U52rkQlCe24CcyxbcKXBp02J5T/MKrIhmi5MLYvrmkVM8pA+UoCXtHQhYbcJcm HGeBYRCOLOnrrJPUYHLtR5ueb0jcYai80+JVpVR2Nr6cVZHfV2KRv9SftsgSOTNZ+lQ6 8Wl0X14A3Z/hBCz9dg2GMXxscEhVzXTmC90bh89KunWvgpRw8PHhljEN6sFPBxx0dqrf Sh/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3FtpTMGFMtZmQJzd0NUb2PTULiHRt3ullBKGW+5trbE3TCPIAa9Zn28uhxTNRzXFEGPG6GRNyVIhvGTLGm
X-Received: by 10.55.41.215 with SMTP id p84mr1573870qkp.35.1489569045253; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 02:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.177.11 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 02:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <34aa00dd-f811-2e42-32e1-e414a8fd37e5@cisco.com>
References: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21A22E1363@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com> <34aa00dd-f811-2e42-32e1-e414a8fd37e5@cisco.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:10:14 +0100
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iLJQTUC2Y7v0RgB9oSdnscn5ga1+D8jv4WKRFeidkcBqQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Cc: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, "opsawg-chairs@ietf.org" <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/xMtJagV5fdkDM6_Dtqa7D1oz2uA>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] IPR poll on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 09:10:48 -0000

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:06 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 3/15/17 2:24 AM, Tianran Zhou wrote:
>> Dear WG Members,
>>
>> We are currently preparing draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05 for working group last call. Here is an IPR poll prior to the wglc.
>>
>> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05.txt?
>
> Yes.  What I am aware of is disclosed according to IETF policies based
> on the pre-adopted version of the various drafts.
>

Thank you.

W

> Eliot
>



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email