IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] opsawg documents that completed IETF Last Call

"Natale, Bob" <RNATALE@mitre.org> Wed, 22 July 2009 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <RNATALE@mitre.org>
X-Original-To: opsawg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0D128C0E6 for <opsawg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IruN0B3Bu3Zn for <opsawg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-bedford.mitre.org (smtp-bedford.mitre.org [129.83.20.191]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1641528C187 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-bedford.mitre.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-bedford.mitre.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6MEa7Mq011234 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:36:07 -0400
Received: from imchub2.MITRE.ORG (imchub2.mitre.org [129.83.29.74]) by smtp-bedford.mitre.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6MEa6VO011210; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:36:06 -0400
Received: from IMCMBX2.MITRE.ORG ([129.83.29.205]) by imchub2.MITRE.ORG ([129.83.29.74]) with mapi; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:36:06 -0400
From: "Natale, Bob" <RNATALE@mitre.org>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:36:04 -0400
Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] opsawg documents that completed IETF Last Call
Thread-Index: AcoKrxcvLEH9+RJ/Rj+JcaCHO0f4ywAKmIRA
Message-ID: <17969D855F28964C88D177D45B6CDF11021C2C46F8@IMCMBX2.MITRE.ORG>
References: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401892EF0@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401892EF0@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] opsawg documents that completed IETF Last Call
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:37:28 -0000

Hi Dan,

I will review the IETF Last Call comments (all related to your initial set, IIRC) over the weekend and consult with your (via this list) wrt whether a new revision should be produced.

If that time frame is unacceptable, please let me know.

Cheers,
BobN

-----Original Message-----
From: opsawg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 5:31 AM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] opsawg documents that completed IETF Last Call

Three opsawg documents completed IETF Last Call and received various
comments: 

- draft-ietf-opsawg-smi-datatypes-in-xsd 
- draft-ietf-opsawg-syslog-msg-mib 
- draft-ietf-opsawg-syslog-snmp 

Can we get a feeling from the WG chair and the editors which of these
documents needs a revision, and which can go to IESG review (possibly
with RFC Editor notes)?

Thanks and Regards,

Dan

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email