IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8520 (7819)

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 23 February 2024 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C589EC14F5F1 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 09:51:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.605
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5u00eVIeVh-U for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 09:51:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1017C14F5E6 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 09:51:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1684; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1708710665; x=1709920265; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=7w6sDYYlUtNqUzXVxgkeYk5SQUyYCX88GusYR0HIZWM=; b=e/84WXH2DvZRWMmtKJu6iAFsv9cuqFInazRjMSjkWuWJdhlSateuCHTX uc+HXASfTheExDLfZsEEW5ZKujgl9bT3GVw0rCRk9YgOmT2dEaDNEF5RS d0ai9Dtpbgg9qJrxW9H5coiNNBNqeKgmi758ZpJ2UoC2CwU9zlCEBTU7s E=;
X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 5N8gAseiQ46+BODja6L81w==
X-CSE-MsgGUID: +p93hi7/R3KgUNCsdPJ5HA==
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,180,1705363200"; d="scan'208";a="10612861"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-9.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Feb 2024 17:51:03 +0000
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([10.61.156.25]) by aer-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 41NHp1Ph035320 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:51:03 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240223174847.EF6001D5C@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 18:50:51 +0100
Cc: Ralph Droms <rdroms@gmail.com>, dromasca@gmail.com, warren@kumari.net, "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>, Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>, jclarke@cisco.com, zhoutianran@huawei.com, opsawg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A52BBDC5-D3DB-47B6-A1CA-874C4A208147@cisco.com>
References: <20240223174847.EF6001D5C@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.156.25, [10.61.156.25]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/TErLzjBRR0yGudaatSu-SePkzk4>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8520 (7819)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:51:10 -0000

I agree.  This erratum should be verified.

> On Feb 23, 2024, at 18:48, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8520,
> "Manufacturer Usage Description Specification".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7819
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
> 
> Section: 13.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> Note: A MUD file may need to be re-signed if the signature expires.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Note: A MUD file may need to be re-signed if the certificate needed
> to validate the signature expires.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The signature does not expire, but the certificate does.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8520 (draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-25)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Manufacturer Usage Description Specification
> Publication Date    : March 2019
> Author(s)           : E. Lear, R. Droms, D. Romascanu
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Operations and Management Area Working Group
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email