Re: [OPSAWG] MUD draft 13 nit : Scope of ACL Name

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Thu, 26 October 2017 17:14 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353BA13EF48 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 10:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NkCMsAao_LBD for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 10:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53E37139059 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 10:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5524; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1509038088; x=1510247688; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=FERbaeQI6wDBpKQF9vJ/Tdgg2HLOMfDwhen1ndZ7B94=; b=I9vsbGlYSf0E2PFRO+dqdEH0yuqqd7f60jhVi+8YhhbDCgx4VqkqruI5 jREHqZlcUEhqcqYc/u6sv5RLCYaKyCMev6dtOYTSwz4b5mD2o5L2y+x+B YXgmWWboVcVZFRUexHd4d2kXF1bS/KwcyPr+Hhl+vT8J402xmMaKw66he 4=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CQAAC6F/JZ/xbLJq1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBhENuJ4N6ih90kBeQfIVEghEHAxgBCoRJTwKFABgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUeAQEBAwEBIUsbCwQUKgICJzAGAQwGAgEBihwQqTaCJyaKTAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQ4KBYMuhWmDAYgZgmEFkVeQJIRBgiOOFYtyhzmWCoE5HziBaDQhCB0VSYJkhGE/NoxGAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,301,1505779200"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="698264848"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Oct 2017 17:14:46 +0000
Received: from [10.61.96.63] (dhcp-10-61-96-63.cisco.com [10.61.96.63]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v9QHEjpo015725; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 17:14:46 GMT
To: "M. Ranganathan" <mranga@gmail.com>, opsawg@ietf.org
References: <CAHiu4JPkhNjXM9BtWcFoa5MzFavtdatX1g4uBu4M37E+nXqwaA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <6e4b760c-3a32-674c-de40-3481bf7ca2d7@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 19:14:38 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHiu4JPkhNjXM9BtWcFoa5MzFavtdatX1g4uBu4M37E+nXqwaA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1GsbOL4vCfIRQfPLpGQkvJ07umKuxD9I6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/VJhnLnSYAqpWOLXq7WiklBFAhfo>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] MUD draft 13 nit : Scope of ACL Name
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 17:14:50 -0000

The acl name comes directly from draft-ietf-netmod-acl.  However, if it
is not clear, the scope is intended to be solely within a MUD file
itself.  I can add words to that effect as part of LC if nobody objects.

Eliot


On 10/26/17 7:12 PM, M. Ranganathan wrote:
>          leaf acl-name {
>              type leafref {
>                path "/acl:access-lists/acl:acl/acl:acl-name";
>              }
>              description
>                "The name of the ACL for this entry.";
>            }
>            leaf acl-type {
>              type identityref {
>                base acl:acl-base;
>              }
>              description
>                "The type of the ACL for this entry.  The name is
>                 scoped ONLY to the MUD file, and may not be unique
>                 in any other circumstance.";
>            }
>
>
>
>
>
> This is a nit (perhaps has already been reported):
>
> Does the description comment on scope belong with the acl-name node?
>
> Thanks
>
> -- 
> M. Ranganathan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg