[OPSAWG] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-12: (with COMMENT)

[John Scudder via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for this document. Paul Wouters DISCUSS rings true for me. I do have one
small comment. Probably this is just an editing mistake left over from some
earlier revision. The last para of the Intro is:

```
   The Security Considerations section covers some of the negative
   outcomes should MUD/firewall managers and IoT manufacturers choose
   not to cooperate.
```

It doesn't, though. I guess either fix the SecCons to do what the Intro says,
or change the Intro to accurately describe the SecCons.