[OPSAWG] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-12: (with COMMENT)

Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 01 December 2021 22:08 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org, opsawg-chairs@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org, ludwig@clemm.org, ludwig@clemm.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <163839650348.13028.12537407547043419871@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 14:08:24 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/ZvB38HQSCZtYWkKyAyiKW5GYpwA>
Subject: [OPSAWG] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-12: (with COMMENT)

Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

[S3.1; question]

* Figure 2: Is PCAP a possible Data Encoding for the Forwarding Plane?

* Figure 2: Should "plain text" be replaced by something like
  "proprietary"?

  I suspect the intent was to communicate that custom/bespoke encodings
  may still be quite common.

[OPSAWG] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Erik Kline via Datatracker
Re: [OPSAWG] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-i… Haoyu Song