Re: [OPSAWG] [ippm] New Version Notification for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-00.txt

Benoit Claise <benoit.claise@huawei.com> Sat, 22 October 2022 07:17 UTC

Return-Path: <benoit.claise@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF1DDC1522D2; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 00:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hldlb3Gol51P; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 00:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 403C4C14CE29; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 00:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml736-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MvXg66xl3z688y7; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 15:15:46 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.82.104.83] (10.82.104.83) by fraeml736-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 09:17:33 +0200
Message-ID: <9ec76bf8-3b10-ada7-d5aa-27c1cf0f2808@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 13:54:03 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.3
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "Thomas.Graf@swisscom.com" <Thomas.Graf@swisscom.com>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
CC: "pierre.francois@insa-lyon.fr" <pierre.francois@insa-lyon.fr>, me <benoit.claise@huawei.com>
References: <166627270221.54679.11910857415331109191@ietfa.amsl.com> <ZRAP278MB0176D2267166C81803A89211892A9@ZRAP278MB0176.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <c097d4aead2848e082431bbd7a4ffe5e@huawei.com>
From: Benoit Claise <benoit.claise@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <c097d4aead2848e082431bbd7a4ffe5e@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.82.104.83]
X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To fraeml736-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.217)
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/_97DVQQG9yPO3qm5THGdSWjQ2X0>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [ippm] New Version Notification for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-00.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 07:17:39 -0000

Hi Tianran,

IPFIX is composed of two components:
1. The IPFIX Metering Process
2. The IPFIX Exporting Process

This draft focuses only on 2.
However, we needed some specific terms to express the IPIFX Metering 
Process location. As an example, see "transit" in the abstract.
It does not make sense to re-invent some new terms to be "independent of 
specific on-path telemetry protocols.", as you wrote.
Hence we selected the IOAM terminology.

I hope this clarifies.

Regards, Benoit
On 10/21/2022 9:29 AM, Tianran Zhou wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Only looking at the abstraction, I think you do not get Greg's comment on on-path telemetry.
> IMO, this IPFIX extension should only focus on the data export, while independent of specific on-path telemetry protocols.
> The following draft is a very useful reference for on path telemetry:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework/18/
>
> " On-Path Telemetry (OPT) refers to data-plane telemetry techniques that directly tap and
>     measure network traffic by embedding instructions or metadata into
>     user packets. "
>
> " It is essential to recognize that existing work on this topic includes a variety of on-path telemetry
>     techniques, including In-situ OAM (IOAM) [RFC9197], IOAM Direct Export (DEX) [I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export], Marking-based
>     Postcard-based Telemetry (PBT-M)[I-D.song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry], Enhanced Alternate Marking
>     (EAM) [I-D.zhou-ippm-enhanced-alternate-marking], and Hybrid Two-Step (HTS) [I-D.mirsky-ippm-hybrid-two-step], have been developed or
>     proposed. "
>
> Hope this is useful for you.
>
> Cheers,
> Tianran
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ippm [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas.Graf@swisscom.com
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 9:42 PM
> To: opsawg@ietf.org; ippm@ietf.org
> Cc: pierre.francois@insa-lyon.fr
> Subject: Re: [ippm] New Version Notification for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-00.txt
>
> Dear OPSAWG and IPPM,
>
> On behalf of the authors. Thank you very much for the comments at IETF 114 in Philadelphia and on the list.
>
> We addressed your feedback in a new document version and renamed the draft document from draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-inband-telemetry to draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry. Thanks Greg for the input.
>
> Looking forward to your reviews and comments.
>
> Best wishes
> Thomas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 3:32 PM
> To: Alex Feng <alex.huang-feng@insa-lyon.fr>; Alex Huang Feng <alex.huang-feng@insa-lyon.fr>; Benoit Claise <benoit.claise@huawei.com>; Graf Thomas, INI-NET-TCZ-ZH1 <Thomas.Graf@swisscom.com>
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-00.txt
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Thomas Graf and posted to the IETF repository.
>
> Name:		draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry
> Revision:	00
> Title:		Export of On-Path Delay in IPFIX
> Document date:	2022-10-20
> Group:		Individual Submission
> Pages:		22
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-00.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry/
> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry
> Diff:      https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-inband-telemetry-01&url2=draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-00&difftype=--html
>
> Abstract:
>     This document introduces new IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
>     information elements to expose the On-Path Telemetry measured delay
>     on the IOAM transit and decapsulation nodes.
>
>                                                                                    
>
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm