[OPSAWG] 答复: Re: 答复: Re: We have submitted a drafts on SNMP usages for P2P networks. We would like to get some suggestions from SNMP experts on the scenario and design for P2P network management. The link to the draft is in the body of this email. thanks！
peng.yonglin@zte.com.cn Tue, 12 July 2011 01:59 UTC
Return-Path: <peng.yonglin@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0504911E8407; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -91.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-91.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.258, BAYES_50=0.001, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X0-Mbot6mmCX; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx5.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C4711E8277; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.17.99] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 48643465113155; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:58:17 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.20] by [192.168.168.15] with StormMail ESMTP id 13796.5408727031; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:59:29 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id p6C1xONr061567; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:59:24 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from peng.yonglin@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <20110708094957.GA85730@elstar.local>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4 March 27, 2005
Message-ID: <OFDD09B9C9.BE54EEF3-ON482578CB.0008CB43-482578CB.000AF220@zte.com.cn>
From: peng.yonglin@zte.com.cn
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:59:23 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2011-07-12 09:59:24, Serialize complete at 2011-07-12 09:59:24
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 000AF21F482578CB_="
X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn p6C1xONr061567
Cc: p2psip@ietf.org, hao.zhenwu@zte.com.cn, li.lichun1@zte.com.cn, opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] 答复: Re: 答复: Re: We have submitted a drafts on SNMP usages for P2P networks. We would like to get some suggestions from SNMP experts on the scenario and design for P2P network management. The link to the draft is in the body of this email. thanks！
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 01:59:49 -0000
The solution in this RFC is good, we will think over it. In SNMP Usage for RELOAD, we also introduce the solution that exchanges secret keys by the certificate of RELOAD. We hope your suggestions. Thanks. ************************************************* 邮 件：peng.yonglin@zte.com.cn 内 线：81543 外 线：025-52871543 手 机：13776637274 传 真：025-52872187 ************************************************* Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> 2011-07-08 17:49 请答复 给 Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> 收件人 peng.yonglin@zte.com.cn 抄送 hao.zhenwu@zte.com.cn, li.lichun1@zte.com.cn, opsawg@ietf.org, p2psip@ietf.org 主题 Re: 答复: Re: [OPSAWG] We have submitted a drafts on SNMP usages for P2P networks. We would like to get some suggestions from SNMP experts on the scenario and design for P2P network management. The link to the draft is in the body of this email. thanks！ On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 05:28:36PM +0800, peng.yonglin@zte.com.cn wrote: > Is the standard which you refer to RFC5953 ? Yes. The revision that got approved as Draft Standard is sitting in the RFC editor queue. For more details about the interoperability tests, see <draft-schoenw-isms-interoperability-report-01.txt>. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> -------------------------------------------------------- ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.
- [OPSAWG] We have submitted a drafts on SNMP usage… peng.yonglin
- Re: [OPSAWG] We have submitted a drafts on SNMP u… Randy Presuhn
- Re: [OPSAWG] We have submitted a drafts on SNMP u… peng.yonglin
- Re: [OPSAWG] We have submitted a drafts on SNMP u… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- [OPSAWG] 答复: Re: We have submitted a drafts on SN… peng.yonglin
- Re: [OPSAWG] 答复: Re: We have submitted a drafts o… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- [OPSAWG] 答复: Re: 答复: Re: We have submitted a draf… peng.yonglin