Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: A YANG Model for Network and VPN Service Performance Monitoring

Hi Adrian,

Thanks again for your helpful review. Please see in line with details.

Thanks,

Bo

> -----邮件原件-----

> 发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Adrian Farrel

> 发送时间: 2022年3月6日 21:57

> 收件人: 'Joe Clarke (jclarke)' <jclarke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>;

> opsawg@ietf.org

> 主题: Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: A YANG Model for Network and VPN Service

> Performance Monitoring

>

> Hi,

>

> I reviewed this draft at -01 [1]. The authors proposed acceptable changes, and

> these have appeared in the subsequent revisions.

>

> As part of WG last call, I have done another quick review. Asides from a few

> trivial nits (below), I think this draft is ready for publication.

>

> Thanks,

> Adrian

>

> [1]

> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/xcSMXTG8Pooi3ypLNyQWEKm7<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/xcSMXTG8Pooi3ypLNyQWEKm7qgg/>

> qgg/<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/xcSMXTG8Pooi3ypLNyQWEKm7qgg/>

>

> ==Nits==

>

> Section 1 para 1

>

> This document shouldn't "propose" anything. It should "define".

[Bo Wu] Thanks. Fixed.

>

> ---

>

> 2.1

>

> s/Service Level Agreements/Service Level Agreement/

[Bo Wu] Thanks. Fixed.

>

> ---

>

> 3.

>

> s/the context of layering/the context of the layering/

[Bo Wu] Thanks. Fixed.

>

> ---

>

> 3.1

>

> s/specified in[RFC8641]/specified in [RFC8641]/

[Bo Wu] Thanks. Fixed.

>

> ---

>

> Obviously, draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common is an RFC now.

> You can replace the reference and fix CCCC.

[Bo Wu] Thanks for catching this. We will fix.

>

> ---

>

>          leaf measurement-interval {

>            type uint32;

>            units "seconds";

>            default "60";

>            description

>              "Indicates the time interval to perform PM measurement.";

>          }

>

> Is a value of 0 supported? What does it mean?

[Bo Wu] Thanks for pointing this out. We will add a constraint of range "1..max" to the node.

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: OPSAWG <opsawg-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Joe Clarke (jclarke)

> Sent: 28 February 2022 23:05

> To: opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>

> Subject: [OPSAWG] WG LC: A YANG Model for Network and VPN Service

> Performance Monitoring

>

> Ahead of IETF 113, we'd like to get working group consensus on

> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm/.  We

> are therefore conducting a two-week WG LC on this work.  I have also

> requested reviews from Yang Docs, Ops, and Routing DIRs.

>

> Please share you comments and reviews on list.

>

> WG LC will end on March 14, 2022.

>

> Thanks.

>

> Joe

>

> _______________________________________________

> OPSAWG mailing list

> OPSAWG@ietf.org<mailto:OPSAWG@ietf.org>

> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

>

> _______________________________________________

> OPSAWG mailing list

> OPSAWG@ietf.org<mailto:OPSAWG@ietf.org>

> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg