[OPSAWG] Acceptance as WG items
Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <ietf@cdl.asgaard.org> Tue, 24 April 2012 23:10 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@cdl.asgaard.org>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7707D11E8093 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.351
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.351 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.248, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aBnkgGupa4u3 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asgaard.org (odin.asgaard.org [204.29.151.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEAE11E8085 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by asgaard.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED5A11438A6; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:10:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at asgaard.org
Received: from asgaard.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (odin.asgaard.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0xYxh5Yk2RwW; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:10:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fenrir.bigswitch.com (74-93-4-129-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [74.93.4.129]) by asgaard.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9903F1143893; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:10:42 +0000 (UTC)
From: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <ietf@cdl.asgaard.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:56:51 -0700
Message-Id: <074A9139-4BD1-417C-BC44-E13A13824E53@cdl.asgaard.org>
To: draft-baker-opsawg-firewalls@tools.ietf.org, draft-kuarsingh-lsn-deployment@tools.ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: opsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] Acceptance as WG items
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:10:46 -0000
Greetings, The other chairs and I believe we have (quiet) consensus on draft-baker-opsawg-firewalls and draft-kuarsingh-lsn-deployment being accepted as working group documents. It may be that the lsn-deployment document may get moved to a v4-transition style working group in the future, but for right now we will continue the work in this WG. Will the authors please update these documents as wg documents and submit initial IDs with the new names? Thank you, Christopher -- 李柯睿 Check my PGP key here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc Current vCard here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.vcf Check my calendar availability: https://tungle.me/cdl
- [OPSAWG] Acceptance as WG items Christopher LILJENSTOLPE