[OPSAWG] Further small issue with draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm
Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 29 April 2022 21:24 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F127BC159A2E; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAY_BE_FORGED=1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9wH5gBZOFxFm; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF27EC159525; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 23TLOZ30023151; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 22:24:35 +0100
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51A24604B; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 22:24:34 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90834604A; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 22:24:34 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 22:24:34 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (229.197.bbplus.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [81.174.197.229] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 23TLOXTl011844 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Apr 2022 22:24:34 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm@ietf.org
Cc: 'opsawg' <opsawg@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 22:24:33 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <09b501d85c0f$85f6abb0$91e40310$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdhcD2Hkpgb0jyNxTCCdo3+Z104weQ==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 81.174.197.229
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-26864.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--3.415-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--3.415-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-26864.003
X-TMASE-Result: 10--3.415300-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: pTq0mT1IyRYOwAmmWH5kBIOlbll4OMtk3AJrtcannrZLIy6IPbYWF7yj PKjtY6O+NylA8lHEnR9751tTDA2z+O9e8ifCHArbC7D4xVwcmkqGiafRvCBWaaEuH17uq9IiOKD FQm59YGr0jNfjusvqBzKHYLsR4q0LTX7PJ/OU3vL+xOhjarOnHt9E6h7ultep3n8eBZjGmUzkwj HXXC/4IzsAVzN+Ov/sFHx7sv9mZmZarimwvIIBfuouCQkHaQbkDDq1hEeszgEUMY/rZb+/8g==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/dbkoxwCewnTPJtTFo-vOFppapnQ>
Subject: [OPSAWG] Further small issue with draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:24:52 -0000
Hi, Apologies for not catching this in the previous review. I noted that the Security Considerations section (Section 6) doesn't match the text suggested (required?) at https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines Is there a reason for this? Fixing it will remove one f the complaints from idnits. Thanks, Adrian
- [OPSAWG] Further small issue with draft-ietf-opsa… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [OPSAWG] Further small issue with draft-ietf-… Wubo (lana)