[OPSAWG] draft-schoenw-opsawg-vm-mib scaling question
"Aamer Akhter (aakhter)" <aakhter@cisco.com> Thu, 02 August 2012 23:30 UTC
Return-Path: <aakhter@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738F211E8129 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 16:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ulF3EaDPwFTS for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 16:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384F511E80F0 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 16:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3298; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1343950253; x=1345159853; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=IePLTKGMdFshLmA6G2uuw9CG/fUCTqgU39h0UtpQAlY=; b=iwGlh8hYP26YHl7rDgSgb/MaDyFJWt8Q3n3Ahnr7yqvd0QX732O60eQZ mp6e7KEYFTXbb4/dH9R/gLUWzSB9EaszGWaes1mOeKEJhXV+bSVkUJ9HM +mvp3g/xBr5KECF5qWU+d4Rhkl8GMETUqWaoJ7HDU2nTXwAJYBIoM3fMj Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAOQMG1CtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABFgkq2UYEHgiIBBBIBGkwSAQweViYBBA4NGodrnQigS5FuYAOjboFmgl8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.77,704,1336348800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="105041004"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Aug 2012 23:30:52 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com [173.37.183.77]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q72NUqrL031281 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 2 Aug 2012 23:30:52 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.5.85]) by xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([173.37.183.77]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 18:30:52 -0500
From: "Aamer Akhter (aakhter)" <aakhter@cisco.com>
To: "draft-schoenw-opsawg-vm-mib@tools.ietf.org" <draft-schoenw-opsawg-vm-mib@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-schoenw-opsawg-vm-mib scaling question
Thread-Index: Ac1xA6F5IspGVUWZRdikvdd9R84mTg==
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 23:30:51 +0000
Message-ID: <75C0E47A1889264493A2DCB2869AC0960F53D096@xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.117.113.212]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19078.004
x-tm-as-result: No--26.947600-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_75C0E47A1889264493A2DCB2869AC0960F53D096xmbrcdx15ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Subject: [OPSAWG] draft-schoenw-opsawg-vm-mib scaling question
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 23:30:54 -0000
Hi there, There was a question regarding scaling in the case of hundreds of VMs etc. In cases if a full dump is not needed, does it make sense to have the ability to create flag setting thresholds that represent an aggregation and portion of a MIB tree? This might provide a more lightweight polling mechanism than a scan of large spans of the MIB. However, Chris made a really good question regarding if MIBs are really relevant given the Regards,aa
- [OPSAWG] draft-schoenw-opsawg-vm-mib scaling ques… Aamer Akhter (aakhter)
- Re: [OPSAWG] draft-schoenw-opsawg-vm-mib scaling … Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [OPSAWG] draft-schoenw-opsawg-vm-mib scaling … Aamer Akhter (aakhter)