Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09
"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Mon, 19 December 2022 15:02 UTC
Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465F7C157B33; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 07:02:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=h5u+LYXi; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=AV3/uYu0
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qye8EzttsM27; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 07:02:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84A75C040913; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 06:23:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=14456; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1671459830; x=1672669430; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=mRaLlhhhOWLdq2MmDea1qk3ehD1nLE7nj4KJRZItL34=; b=h5u+LYXiuqE3DqT7ocjqgYFpEEo1QuskU4VdiXg+xHsN4TrGVkQXWlTF dU90DocXHCMYZKfWnW/PQpdLtwDiKDvUDx6xRXLB3mCJot++4cFNds/Nd 8uO341Jkamyv/xcv9aMIOPHPWK9CkumbEo2Wmn1MnwediI0OLGjiJ4m6m E=;
X-IPAS-Result: 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
IronPort-PHdr: A9a23:Xo6CxBRcRI5nx5zKhdK0VrrrZdpso7vLVj580XJvo75Nc6H2+ZPkM QSf4Ph2l1bGUM3d7O4MkOvZta3sGAliqZaMuXwPatpAAhkCj8hFkwkpGsXQD0r9IbbjZDA7G 8IXUlhj8jm7PEFZFdy4aUfVpyi57CUZHVP0Mg8mTtk=
IronPort-Data: A9a23:7qLq56mLXr0JM8CbYnBGEH7o5gywJkRdPkR7XQ2eYbSJt1+Wr1Gzt xJLCGzVP6yPYGT1L9hwaI7kph9Q6sTUm4BrHQY+qCA0FFtH+JHPbTi7wugcHM8zwunrFh8PA xA2M4GYRCwMZiaA4E/raNANlFEkvU2ybuKU5NXsZ2YgG2eIdA970Ug5wrRg09Yx6TSEK1rlV e3a8pW31GCNg1aYAkpMg05UgEoy1BhakGpwUm0WPZinjneH/5UmJM53yZWKEpfNatI88thW6 Ar05OrREmvxp3/BAz4++1rxWhVirrX6ZWBihpfKMkSvqkAqm8A87ko0HL07WxxyhB65pPRw4 9tDm8WIZlktFaKZzYzxUzEAe81/FaRC/LmCKn+lvInKiUbHaHDrhf5pCSnaP6VBpb0xWj8Ir KdecWtUBvyAr7reLLaTUPZtgtgkKuHgPZgUvTdryjSx4fMOG8CeG/2bv4UwMDEYhulsOav4W NojS2RJVAieTjNEFA5JIcdr9AuvriCvL2IHwL6PnoIw+3Pa0wNZ0bXxPpzSYNPibclPl0iE4 2PL42q8BQkBPcOQjCGM6jSlguvnnC7nVsQVDrLQ3vttgFSWy2BVAhoLXlK3qPijokmkUtRQJ gof/S9GkEQp3EWvSt+4VBqirTvd+BUdQNFXVeY97Wlh15Y4/S7eIVpfazFqWOcCteQ4SxJz7 nDXm/jmUGkHXKKudVqR8bKdrDWXMCcTLHMfaSJscefjy4S4yG3Upk+SJuuPAJJZnfWuQmipn G7iQDwWwuRN05Fajs1X6Hid21qRSo71ohnZD+k9dkuh6g5/DGJOT9P1sQGAhRqswXrwc7Vsl HEAn87b5+cUANTU0ieMW+4KWrqu4p5p0QEwY3YxRfHNFBz0pBZPmLy8Bhklfi+F1e5fI1fUj Lf741852XOqFCLCgVVLS4ywEd826qPrCM7oUPvZBvIXPMcoL1/XpnsxNRDNt4wIrKTKufxjU Xt8WZvzZUv29Yw7pNZLb75HiORylnxWKZ37HMqrlXxLLoZylFbMGetabzNin8gy7biPp03O4 s1DOs6Royizo8WgChQ7BbU7dAhQRVBiXMieg5UOKoarfFE8cEl/UKC5/F/UU9E/90ijvr2Wr ijVt44x4AeXuEAr3i3RMSE+N+2zAMsnxZ/5VAR1VWuVN7EYSd7HxM8im1EfJ9HLKMQLISZIc sQ4
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:NDIw5Kp2IuY/0+OucTZIn1MaV5uAL9V00zEX/kB9WHVpm5Oj+f xGzc516farslossSkb6Ky90KnpewK5yXcH2/hvAV7EZniohILIFvAv0WKG+Vzd8kLFh5ZgPM tbAspD4ZjLfCVHZKXBkUeF+rQbsaK6GcmT7I+0pRoMPGJXguNbnn1E422gYypLrXx9dOME/e 2nl6x6TlSbCBEqR/X+IkNAc/nIptXNmp6jSwUBHQQb5A6Hii7twKLmEjCDty1uEg9n8PMHyy zoggb57qKsv7WQ0RnHzVLe6JxQhZ/I1sZDPsqRkcIYQw+cyjpAJb4RGIFqjgpF5d1H22xa1O UkZC1QePib3kmhPF1dZyGdnTUIngxeskMKgmXo/0cL6faJNQ7STfAx3b6wtnDimhAdVBYW6t MR44vRjeslMfvN8R6Nl+TgRlVkkFG5rmEllvNWh3tDUZEGYLsUtoAH+lhJea1wVx4SxbpXWd WGNvusrMp+YBefdTTUr2NvyNujUjA6GQqHWFELvoiQ3yJNlH50wkMEzIhH901wua4VWt1B/a DJI65onLZBQosfar98Hv4IRY+yBnbWSRzBPWqOKRDsFb0BOXjKt5nriY9Frt2CadgN1t8/iZ 7BWFRXuSo7fF/vE9SH2NlR/hXEUAyGLELQIwFllu9EU5HHNc7W2He4OSITeuOb0oAiPvE=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,255,1665446400"; d="scan'208";a="28500922"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 19 Dec 2022 14:23:49 +0000
Received: from mail.cisco.com (xfe-rtp-005.cisco.com [64.101.210.235]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 2BJENmJ0026163 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 19 Dec 2022 14:23:48 GMT
Received: from xfe-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.251) by xfe-rtp-005.cisco.com (64.101.210.235) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1118.9; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 09:23:47 -0500
Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xfe-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.251) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1118.9 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 08:23:47 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=LEuApHHfVG4Dm+zWt4s7mQ6gwI94luOvousE4P4m/2irzpadz+kUtgHIpIRqjQaXkRHI9NI9StaKeDsmK0z5NRU2BdzMsW81yxze/+XFIIRaCoilmLgWgkNXa8UBwOkQDUTM+smc4fLbbpLb2SpRlNyUe/fCM4urTJywIpwH0nUDDOR4n6a4H/3E9sI8FkVYMHUkeAwdiuXKO3dvTpx+tGMaU6Ye2mueVoJTzIBGpaSLbxXxABfebyN4xr5osZ+gAqxOdA11gnZHewqMAUFajuDcOSW/H8VJabqrNOOHjdooeMoZTW9Nz+0vwodLLAc0WeTHFX+L0ATvfv/FmflmWA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=XG4IljxWH3v7XTNPTnVAxnYWQ8hTSFjqxqEfTd7TtuY=; b=oNMXNlpgxJ1gqsUNZifYK2maQvQJi36gzdeVHHAbfbVR+Be7mLJC9x9CgJ0oLDI89kH/jlFCScYSBOWRGN6jT8pw4z+EeDeauqd6qVAy0E3agI/P0nUAieEHEfPwmPqNaiWCae3756me8OnBItFuVvQNAsU2TDqhXZsgB+zvngemBiEg56e9yc6NVYf8g9IodTpbHW4KFNVYHiVRkFAVbxVedb7gHVh6nustDagP3nIeGjlnfdye7Xtgc6X6e54qeWWXQBR1+AXxPrFTF4H4WMuDld2phUoxYfn95gRFOmw+ktX/xntqNLnRX/HcJfwXvgj/ZCm0cgchwziijOjfOA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=XG4IljxWH3v7XTNPTnVAxnYWQ8hTSFjqxqEfTd7TtuY=; b=AV3/uYu0WNeyFeF3rrsrxFlIioDxQgN9TkPDQCA/UMyEdg//FZuhq3tpLDBY9pUJ8UuxO/4FeH9BiHIUogRqy9DSDwXJlQQMBm2U41mRieQyvzfFsTIm3mwew61AOVjHcK+nszGbQrJL9fYjo9SL8DNUYkwJFNZOTkl8HmiQz00=
Received: from BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:1ce::13) by MN0PR11MB5962.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:371::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5924.16; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 14:23:45 +0000
Received: from BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::39ca:2d87:558d:9c17]) by BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::39ca:2d87:558d:9c17%4]) with mapi id 15.20.5924.016; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 14:23:45 +0000
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
CC: "draft-ietf-opsawg-sap.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-sap.all@ietf.org>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09
Thread-Index: AdjPQx6o5IkGa/MiRbSgFOql4kxVLAAATHXwAS1rwBAABRW0gAAFIiHwB6xNwiAGQBFXsACUgjGwAMYGN4AABplqsACXC4vg
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 14:23:44 +0000
Message-ID: <BY5PR11MB419616D3DFB531150FFB8867B5E59@BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BY5PR11MB41965219142B5D7477437604B5519@BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <10618_1663938212_632DAEA4_10618_131_22_be9e97dad413420db9ac52ea0c8b38f0@orange.com> <BY5PR11MB4196EE66FFC3E63DE28AABA7B5579@BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <11971_1664461105_6335A931_11971_276_1_ff1bd715600144a4831e519922785bbe@orange.com> <BY5PR11MB4196A321341B8076C67590BEB53D9@BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <9635_1668006642_636BC2F2_9635_247_13_7e4598d105a54d1c90d7f96a01510be8@orange.com> <BY5PR11MB41966D73AF207BB2B5888349B51C9@BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <15240_1670849563_6397241B_15240_317_19_a0b764466e5141689ec95d8c53eedcdf@orange.com> <BY5PR11MB4196B8D3776B2123BF7591C2B5E69@BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <10919_1671200230_639C7DE6_10919_362_1_1d69d538f6af4047bec944badad3de50@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <10919_1671200230_639C7DE6_10919_362_1_1d69d538f6af4047bec944badad3de50@orange.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_SetDate=2022-12-16T14:16:48Z; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Method=Privileged; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Name=unrestricted_parent.2; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_SiteId=90c7a20a-f34b-40bf-bc48-b9253b6f5d20; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_ActionId=fda9cb4b-83ca-4304-9954-b16b70a6cceb; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_ContentBits=0
authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY5PR11MB4196:EE_|MN0PR11MB5962:EE_
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 7edd0315-d659-45fe-42f0-08dae1cca2f5
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-relay: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230022)(4636009)(366004)(136003)(39860400002)(376002)(396003)(346002)(451199015)(38070700005)(6916009)(54906003)(53546011)(6506007)(7696005)(316002)(966005)(478600001)(38100700002)(122000001)(4326008)(8676002)(66476007)(76116006)(64756008)(86362001)(66556008)(66446008)(66946007)(71200400001)(5660300002)(83380400001)(30864003)(52536014)(8936002)(66574015)(33656002)(2906002)(9686003)(55016003)(186003)(41300700001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: 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
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 7edd0315-d659-45fe-42f0-08dae1cca2f5
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Dec 2022 14:23:44.9750 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: oO/7F9Se4Hw9sFESx49KKd6IRdaM2idecwwV44VW5mdY4IPh7t9Yfjt8fscJYEi8IFME2GeKRXnjLm2URhT01g==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN0PR11MB5962
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.210.235, xfe-rtp-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/fbgf5Eau_9Sf7m76yrDTL_ivaas>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 15:02:28 -0000
Hi Med, Great, thanks. I've request IETF LC on -12. If any clarifications or changes are required based on the question raised by Tom then please can you resolve that as part of the IETF LC. Regards, Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> > Sent: 16 December 2022 14:17 > To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com> > Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-sap.all@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org > Subject: RE: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09 > > Hi Rob, > > The proposed edits look good to me. These are now implemented in the public - > 12. Thanks. > > cheers, > Med > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com> > > Envoyé : vendredi 16 décembre 2022 12:11 > > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> > > Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-sap.all@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org > > Objet : RE: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09 > > > > Hi Med, > > > > Thanks for persevering, I think that we are pretty much there. > > > > I've have proposed some minor tweaks the description and YANG leaf > > descriptions that I think may improve clarity, but I'll leave it > > to you to decide whether it would be helpful to incorporate these. > > Please either merge/some all of these and post an updated version > > or indicate whether you would like to stick with -11, and then I > > can kick off the IETF LC. > > > > OLD: > > 'service-status': Indicates the administrative and operational > > status of the service for a given SAP. This information is > > particularly useful when many services are enabled for the > > same > > SAP, but only a subset of these services are activated. As > > such, > > the administrative 'service-status' MUST NOT be influenced > > by the > > value of the 'sap-status'. > > > > The service 'oper-status' reflects the service operational > > status > > as observed for a specific SAP, not the status that is > > determined > > at the network level for a service that involves many SAPs. > > That > > network level status can be retrieved using specific network > > models, e.g., Section 7.3 of [RFC9182] or Section 7.3 of > > [RFC9291]. > > > > In order to assess the service delivery status for a given > > SAP, it > > is recommended to check both the administrative and > > operational > > service status ('service-status') in addition to the 'sap- > > status'. > > In doing so, a network controller (or an operator) can > > detect > > anomalies. For example, if a service is administratively > > enabled > > for a SAP and the 'sap-status' of that SAP is reported as > > being > > down, the service 'oper-status' is also expected to be down. > > Retrieving a distinct service operational status under these > > conditions can be used as a trigger to detect an anomaly. > > Likewise, administrative status and operational status can > > be used > > as a trigger to detect service-specific SAP activation > > anomalies. > > For example, a service that is administratively declared as > > inactive for a SAP but reported as operationally active for > > that > > SAP is an indication that some service provision actions are > > needed to align the observed service status with the > > expected > > service status. > > > > NEW: > > 'service-status': Indicates the administrative and > > operational > > status of the service for a given SAP. This information is > > particularly useful when many services are provisioned for > > the same > > SAP, but only a subset of these services are activated. As > > such, > > the administrative 'service-status' MUST NOT be influenced > > by the > > value of the operational 'sap-status'. > > > > The service 'oper-status' reflects the operational status of > > the > > service only as observed at a specific SAP, not the overall > > network level status of the service connecting many SAPs. > > The > > network level service status can be retrieved using specific > > network models, e.g., Section 7.3 of [RFC9182] or Section > > 7.3 of > > [RFC9291]. > > > > In order to assess the service delivery status for a given > > SAP, it > > is recommended to check both the administrative and > > operational > > service status ('service-status') in addition to the 'sap- > > status'. > > In doing so, a network controller (or operator) can detect > > anomalies. For example, if a service is administratively > > enabled > > for a SAP and the 'sap-status' of that SAP is reported as > > being > > down, the service 'oper-status' is also expected to be down. > > Retrieving a distinct service operational status under these > > conditions can be used as a trigger to detect an anomaly. > > Likewise, administrative status and operational status can > > be > > compared to detect service-specific SAP activation > > anomalies. > > For example, a service that is administratively declared as > > inactive for a SAP but reported as operationally active for > > that > > SAP is an indication that some service provision actions are > > needed to align the observed service status with the > > expected > > service status. > > > > Some proposed tweaks to YANG container/leaf descriptions: > > > > container sap-status { > > config false; > > description > > "Indicates the operational status of the SAP, > > independent > > of any service provisioned over it."; > > > > container admin-status { > > description > > "Administrative service status."; > > leaf status { > > type identityref { > > base vpn-common:administrative-status; > > } > > description > > "Administrative status of the service provisioned > > at the SAP."; > > } > > leaf last-change { > > ... > > } > > > > container oper-status { > > config false; > > description > > "Operational status of the service provisioned at > > the SAP."; > > uses vpn-common:oper-status-timestamp; > > } > > } > > } > > } > > > > Regards, > > Rob > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com > > <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> > > > Sent: 12 December 2022 12:53 > > > To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com> > > > Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-sap.all@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org > > > Subject: RE: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09 > > > > > > Hi Rob, > > > > > > Thanks for the follow-up. > > > > > > After rereading the initial proposed updated text, I think that > > you > > > have a valid point about the need for more clarity when > > describing the > > > relationship between the various status data nodes. I released - > > 11 > > > with an attempt to make that better. Both the data nodes > > description > > > and the examples are updated to reflect the intent. The > > relationship > > > (including what should be considered as > > > anomalies) are also described. > > > > > > The new text also clarifies that the per-SAP service status > > should not > > > be confused with the global service status (which may involved > > more > > > than one SAP). Adrian's comment that a SAP failure does not > > imply a > > > service failure is true for that global service status, not for > > the > > > (per-SAP) service status included in the SAP. > > > > > > The new text is available at: > > > > > > URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf- > > opsawg-sap-11.txt > > > Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft- > > ietf-opsawg-sap-11 > > > > > > Hope this is better. Thanks. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Med > > > > > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > > > De : Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com> Envoyé : > > vendredi 9 > > > > décembre 2022 15:22 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET > > > > <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>; draft-ietf-opsawg- > > sap.all@ietf.org; > > > > opsawg@ietf.org Objet : RE: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg- > > sap-09 > > > > > > > > Hi Med, > > > > > > > > Sorry, still not clear (in my head) on the exact > > differentiation > > > > between sap-status and service-status. > > > > > > > > Also, a few other nits that I spotted: > > > > s/is capable to host/is capable of hosting/ (two places) s/ > > that > > > > uniquely identifies SAP/ that uniquely identifies a SAP/ s/ > > are > > > > tagged as ready to host/ are tagged as being capable of > > hosting/ > > > > > > > > Please see inline ... > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com > > <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> > > > > > Sent: 09 November 2022 15:11 > > > > > To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com>; draft-ietf- > > opsawg- > > > > > sap.all@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org > > > > > Subject: RE: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But how do you distinguish between a SAP that hasn't > > been > > > > > > > > provisioned yet to a service vs a SAP that has been > > > > provisioned > > > > > > > > but the service is down? E.g., trying to find a free > > SAP > > > > just > > > > > > > > by looking for a SAP with a service-status of op-down > > > > doesn't > > > > > > > > appear to be sufficient on its own. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Med] A SAP that is not provisioned yet will have a > > > > > > > sap-status=down, > > > > > > while > > > > > > > the one that is provision but the service is not > > activated > > > > will > > > > > > > have > > > > > > sap- > > > > > > > status=up and service-status=down. Isn't that > > sufficient? > > > > > > > > > > > > I would have assumed: > > > > > > - If sap-status is down then the service-status must also > > be > > > > down, > > > > > > right? > > > > > > > > > > [Med] Actually, no. The service status indicates whether a > > > > service is > > > > > associated with the SAP. Added both the admin and op status > > of > > > > the > > > > > service status and added this NEW text: > > > > > > > > > > "This data node indicates whether a service is bound to this > > SAP > > > > and, > > > > > as such, it is not influenced by the value of the 'sap- > > status'." > > > > [Rob Wilton (rwilton)] > > > > > > > > " 'service-status': Reports the status of the service for a > > given > > > > SAP. ...". This states that it is reporting the status of the > > > > service for a given SAP. > > > > > > > > For the service-status/admin-status I can see how the service > > can be > > > > admin-up for a SAP that is down (e.g., perhaps there is a > > broken > > > > fiber such that the physical interface or sub-interface is > > down). > > > > But I would still find it confusing to say that the service at > > the > > > > SAP is operationally up on a SAP that is down. > > > > > > > > Specifically, if a customer was to ask whether there are able > > to get > > > > service at a particular SAP, is it sufficient for the operator > > to > > > > check service-status/oper-status on the SAP, or must they > > check both > > > > service-status/oper-status and service-status/sap-status to > > know > > > > whether or not they will be receiving service at a particular > > SAP? > > > > > > > > If the draft description, and perhaps even more critically, > > the YANG > > > > model description, can be really clear on this, I think that > > will > > > > help implementors and users. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Rob > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________ > > > _________________________________________________________ > > > > > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des > > informations > > > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre > > diffuses, > > > exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce > > message > > > par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire > > ainsi > > > que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant > > susceptibles > > > d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message > > a ete > > > altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > > > > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or > > > privileged information that may be protected by law; they should > > not > > > be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > > > If you have received this email in error, please notify the > > sender and > > > delete this message and its attachments. > > > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that > > have > > > been modified, changed or falsified. > > > Thank you. > > > ________________________________________________________________ > _________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce > message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this > message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you.
- [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09 Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09 mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09 mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09 Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09 mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09 Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09 Adrian Farrel
- Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09 mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09 Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09 mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09 Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09 mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09 tom petch
- Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09 Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09 Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09 tom petch
- Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09 mohamed.boucadair