Re: [OPSAWG] EARLY CALL: Agenda topics for IETF 103

[Eliot Lear <[e-mail]>]

Hi Joe,

I'd like a slot to talk a little bit more about onboarding for IoT. 
This will cover at least three drafts, one of which is
draft-lear-eap-teap-brski-01, another of which is
draft-friel-brski-over-802dot11-01.txt, and there will be a third out
this weekend.

The purpose of the presentation is to examine the evolution of
mechanisms that we have in flight, including ANIMA BRSKI, discuss some
of the shortcomings, particularly as relates to wireless, and then talk
a little bit about what might happen.  There are other drafts in this
space as well.  Michael Richardson has several, as does Peter van der
Stock, and they may wish to contribute as well:

And so the layout of the presentation and discussion would be as follows:

  * Problem statement – getting stuff provisioned onto the network
  * Existing technology – ANIMA BRSKI, Device Provisioning Protocol, etc
  * Some additional challenges – power saving, memory footprint, device
    capabilities
  * What's happening at the IETF
  * What's left to do
  * What might need to happen elsewhere

I think I can cover this ground in 20-25 minutes, but more time would be
better, if we have it.

Eliot

On 11.09.18 19:05, Joe Clarke wrote:
> Hello, opsawg.  We have requested a meeting slot for IETF 103 in
> Bangkok.  Like previous meetings, we have requested a 2.5 hour meeting
> combining opsawg and Ops Area.
>
> We'd like to get people to start thinking about presentation topics and
> to start working on their slides.
>
> If you are thinking about proposing a presentation, keep in mind that
> your presentation should _NOT_ simply present your document
> section-by-section.  In fact, it shouldn't present your document
> section-by-section at all.
>
> A good presentation will discuss the problem briefly, describe the
> solution, and then ask questions of the WG as to what is needed to
> proceed with the document.  That is, what areas do you need specific
> input?  Where might you need help to fully form a viable solution?  What
> additional considerations should WG be aware of?
>
> In addition to proposing your presentation, email the list ahead of the
> meeting requesting a review of your document and seeding your questions
> so the WG can prepare good answers for you.
>
> Remember, we want a discussion both in the room and on the list.
>
> Finally, keep your time in mind.  Many slots are 10 minutes, which
> should likely have a max of four slides to allow for some discussion.
>
> Presentations that simply go section-by-section through documents will
> not be accepted.
>
> Please send requests for presentation slots to [e-mail].
> The final cut off for presentations will be October 31, 2018 to ensure
> the list has time to review documents.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Joe on behalf of the co-chairs
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>