[OPSAWG] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: (with COMMENT)

[Paul Wouters via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I have not much to add to my esteemed collegue's Éric::Vyncke/128 review, two
nits:

  |     +--rw under-maintenance!
  |     |  +--rw contact    string

This could use a freeform field or duration field to hold information about
expected maintenance time, as that would be the main question anyone could have
for the contact person :)

  description
    "This module extends the ietf-service-assurance-device module to
     add specific support for devices of ACME Corporation. ";

I would somehow put in the Example word in there to avoid anyone thinking that
this is a real definition. I know it is stated before, but implementers just
scanning code might miss it :)