[OPSAWG] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-opsawg-lsn-deployment-01.txt
Victor Kuarsingh <victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com> Sun, 14 October 2012 22:07 UTC
Return-Path: <victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B78521F84FC for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:07:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wal2MDy6--eR for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com (mail-ie0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C084621F84F8 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 9so8110566iec.31 for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Byr+lrX7FBybGifASnrG5IfH40FPmxNqjFjq8ayLVYA=; b=bRtMrps9bjYnS4xJNV8fgXSsnzD2m6d3fgQyrxnnVa2Wp940pbrciWW+of4loiXWUK MSclTt88nEdSit7Wo9QZS9JCwKIVQBSTiBGFCSh1RFjRKDVa5Y8YDzN+WNS2kr21Zukf 9TBL9oKId8t91owuM1D2Q2AjKqHD2EOTe39gOFcmiLo5y7E8p+ova97FjQC1y+dr5L82 2YAFk8hQl/QUfryC1StF64bWZUpWzv1anPlHdC3rEdBo6Yx7V6nL1t0rBe6Vn2TiZ2lk mb53HufCpgpnS4Wd7LHPikk9dgfVzyFm74H935zX63vK2EHpFgcV5eM4R5E/AlE4J+Xx AnbA==
Received: by 10.50.194.132 with SMTP id hw4mr7177469igc.35.1350252467464; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.100.204] ([67.224.83.162]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ez8sm4831538igb.17.2012.10.14.15.07.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 18:07:30 -0400
From: Victor Kuarsingh <victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com>
To: opsawg-chairs@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org
Message-ID: <CCA0AEE5.372BB%victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-opsawg-lsn-deployment-01.txt
In-Reply-To: <20121014220259.8893.39384.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: [OPSAWG] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-opsawg-lsn-deployment-01.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:07:49 -0000
Chairs/Group, I have posted an update to the LSN deployment draft. I have removed some of the original content around CGN performance and replaced it with a referent to [donley-nat444-impacts] since that document is more complete (which was not available when this draft was first posted a while back). Made some other minor edits/changes. Overall, I have not receive much in the way of comments. I would appreciate comments, but given the historical conversation on this draft, I am not sure if I will get much more. I did email (following IETF84) v4sunset behave previously for comments, but did not receive any. If the group/chairs are willing, I would like to move to WGLC if possible. Regards, Victor Kuarsingh On 2012-10-14 6:02 PM, "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote: > >A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-opsawg-lsn-deployment-01.txt >has been successfully submitted by Victor Kuarsingh and posted to the >IETF repository. > >Filename: draft-ietf-opsawg-lsn-deployment >Revision: 01 >Title: CGN Deployment with BGP/MPLS IP VPNs >Creation date: 2012-10-15 >WG ID: opsawg >Number of pages: 17 >URL: >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-opsawg-lsn-deployment-01.tx >t >Status: >http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-lsn-deployment >Htmlized: >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-lsn-deployment-01 >Diff: >http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-lsn-deployment-01 > >Abstract: > This document specifies a framework to integrate a Network Address > Translation layer into an operator's network to function as a Carrier > Grade NAT (also known as CGN or Large Scale NAT). The CGN > infrastructure will often form a NAT444 environment as the subscriber > home network will likely also contain a NAT function. Exhaustion of > the IPv4 address pool is a major driver compelling some operators to > implement CGN. Although operators may wish to deploy IPv6 to > strategically overcome IPv4 exhaustion, near term needs may not be > satisfied with an IPv6 deployment alone. This document provides a > practical integration model which allows the CGN platform to be > integrated into the network meeting the connectivity needs of the > subscriber while being mindful of not disrupting existing services > and meeting the technical challenges that CGN brings. The model > included in this document utilizes BGP/MPLS IP VPNs which allow for > virtual routing separation helping ease the CGNs impact on the > network. This document does not intend to defend the merits of CGN. > > > > > >The IETF Secretariat >
- [OPSAWG] FW: New Version Notification for draft-i… Victor Kuarsingh