[OPSAWG] FW: WGLC draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds

"Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> Thu, 02 February 2012 14:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C6821F8552 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 06:44:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eAhXMUsLunXQ for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 06:44:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D432621F854D for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 06:44:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q12Eino4026581 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 15:44:49 +0100
Received: from DEMUEXC048.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.32.94]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q12Eikj7021411 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 15:44:49 +0100
Received: from DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.18]) by DEMUEXC048.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 2 Feb 2012 15:44:46 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:44:46 +0100
Message-ID: <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A64035A06AC@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] WGLC draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds
Thread-Index: AczhtLfJ96ScALNxRWKCTLJWPtiZzQABFBbg
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
To: opsawg@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Feb 2012 14:44:46.0883 (UTC) FILETIME=[3572FF30:01CCE1B9]
Subject: [OPSAWG] FW: WGLC draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:44:51 -0000

I also changed "manager principle" to "principal" and 
defined principal in the terminology section.

Cheers, 
Mehmet 

-----Original Message-----
From: ext David Harrington [mailto:ietfdbh@comcast.net] 
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 3:12 PM
To: Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds

That's better.
Thanks,
--
David Harrington
Director, Transport Area
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Ietfdbh@comcast.net
+1-603-828-1401





On 1/30/12 2:30 PM, "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)"
<mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> wrote:

>Hi David,
>
>> >> NEW:
>> >> An agent entity can restrict access to a certain portion of its
>MIB,
>> >> e.g.
>> >> restrict some manager principals to view performance-related
>statistics,
>> >>
>> >> allow only a single designated manager principal to view or update
>> >> configuration parameters or disallow other manager principals to
>read
>> >> the performance-related statistics.
>> >
>> >OK
>> 
>> I agree with making the text examples. I think one example should be
>that
>> some managers might only be allowed read-only access while others are
>> allowed read-write access.
>> The new text mixes operations and specific views (perf stats), so the
>RO
>> vs RW example is not very clearly shown.
>
>Would this work for you? If not please provide some NEW text.
>
>NEW: 
>An agent entity can restrict access to a certain portion of its MIB,
>e.g. restrict 
>some manager principals to view only performance-related statistics, or
>disallow 
>other manager principals to read those performance-related statistics.
>An agent entity can also restrict to monitoring (read-only) as opposed
>to monitoring 
>and configuration (read-write) of a certain portion of its MIB, e.g.
>allowing only a 
>single designated manager principal to update configuration parameters.
>
>Cheers,
>Mehmet
>