Re: [OPSAWG] review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-08

Hi Michael,

On 9/15/2022 12:19 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>      > I have read draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture at the
>      > request of a few people.  This is not part of any directorate review
>      > (that I remember, or that shows up in my review list).  If it's useful
>      > for me to plug this in somewhere, let me know.
>
> Turns out I'm the shepherd.
> And I've now done a write up for both documents, having read both of them and
> reviewed the ML traffic, and the like.
Thanks.
>
> I do wonder if they wouldn't be better (for the IESG review) as a single document.
If you are asking me, yes those two documents should be treated 
together. Is this one or two write ups, up to the WG chairs and AD to 
decide.
A single document, I don't think so. Let's assume we need to 
update/change the YANG module

Regards, Benoit

>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>   -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg