[OPSAWG] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-15: (with COMMENT)

[Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-15: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for working on this specification.

I also stumbled upon "sbom" and "vuln" nodes in section 1.2. I assumed these
refers to the nodes in the YANG tree sbom node = starts with sbom- and vuln
node = starts with vuln- .... yes that I had to guess to continue reading. Now
I see Roman has a discuss on this point hence supporting the discuss. I believe
evenif it might be a convention call those node as I assumed, we could be more
clear by actually describing the notion in the doc. And if my assumption is
wrong then we definitely need to describe the nodes so that readers like me
don't make wrong assumption :-).