IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Adoption: draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp

t.petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Tue, 12 August 2014 08:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329D51A07A0 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 01:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r8_YDpwIzUtB for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 01:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db3lrp0077.outbound.protection.outlook.com [213.199.154.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63D341A0799 for <OpsAWG@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 01:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DB3PR07MB058.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.137.148) by DB3PR07MB0665.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (25.160.50.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1005.10; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:44:43 +0000
Received: from pc6 (109.147.210.26) by DB3PR07MB058.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.137.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1005.10; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:44:42 +0000
Message-ID: <00b401cfb609$8e6b6ec0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <OpsAWG@ietf.org>, draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp@tools.ietf.org
References: <CAHw9_iLpwZ5GuXjsZUq-kvRf1=3BvGt05Osp=P2e56V3-or9CA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 09:43:14 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Originating-IP: [109.147.210.26]
X-ClientProxiedBy: DB4PR03CA0025.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.39.163) To DB3PR07MB058.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.137.148)
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;UriScan:;UriScan:;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0301360BF5
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(377454003)(13464003)(189002)(51704005)(51444003)(164054003)(199003)(106356001)(105586002)(31966008)(50466002)(85852003)(107886001)(21056001)(81542001)(74502001)(66066001)(33646002)(19580405001)(86362001)(42186005)(104166001)(95666004)(19580395003)(92566001)(83322001)(93916002)(20776003)(47776003)(102836001)(85306004)(61296003)(107046002)(116806002)(92726001)(62966002)(14496001)(77096002)(74662001)(83072002)(99396002)(87976001)(76176999)(81686999)(50986999)(87286001)(50226001)(101416001)(89996001)(81816999)(4396001)(88136002)(77156001)(15975445006)(84392001)(64706001)(80022001)(44736004)(2201001)(44716002)(79102001)(46102001)(62236002)(23756003)(76482001)(77982001)(81342001)(74416001)(2501001)(7726001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:DB3PR07MB058; H:pc6; FPR:; MLV:nov; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0; LANG:en;
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/tZvPXN8iTONkdz4IzdBag1KM5Qw
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Adoption: draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:44:54 -0000

I support adoption.  It brings USM up-to-date.

However, I am aware of
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hartman-snmp-sha2/
which looks remarkable similar in scope but different in detail.  I
regard
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp/
as the superior I-D but am surprised at the existence of the other, with
its distinguished list of editors.  Any ideas what their intentions are?

I would not want to see a merger of the two I-Ds, I think that that
would be the worst outcome, although having both become RFC would also
be a bad result.

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Warren Kumari" <warren@kumari.net>
To: "opsawg@ietf.org" <OpsAWG@ietf.org>;
<draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp@tools.ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 10:28 PM
Subject: [OPSAWG] Call for Adoption: draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp


> Dear OpsAWG WG,
>
> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.
>
> The draft is available here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp/
>
> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for
> adoption by OpsAWG,
> and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
>
> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review,
etc.
>
> This call for adoption ends Mon 25-Aug-2014.
>
> In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 ("Promoting Compliance with
> Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)"):
> If you are personally aware of any IPR that applies to
> draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance
> with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more
> details.)
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Warren Kumari
> (as OpsAWG WG co-chair)
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email