[OPSAWG] bof proposal review
"Marc Blanchet" <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Tue, 04 October 2016 15:02 UTC
Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA701298B0 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 08:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tlVZCcrVgE8H for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 08:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A449129555 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 08:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [206.123.31.198] (h198.viagenie.ca [206.123.31.198]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4C6E40414 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 11:02:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 11:02:39 -0400
Message-ID: <BBD56DCC-3680-4C43-96F2-E96490BB4CBF@viagenie.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.5r5263)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/uP1nNhCEvVw9mr4j43eNRXxY8oc>
Subject: [OPSAWG] bof proposal review
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 15:02:42 -0000
Hello, the bof proposal below have been sent to OPS ADs (and INT ADs) and posted on the BOF wiki page. BenoƮt asked that this to be discussed here, since there is no public mailing list yet for this topic (we shall soon). The primary purpose of the BOF is to extend the discussion to more operators (and other parties obviously) than the initial set to get an (hopefully) common set of requirements and identifying possible protocol work. It is a non- wg forming. Regards, Marc. =========== Name: IP Provisioning for SDN/NFV (ipprov) Description: With the dynamic nature of SDN/NFV networks, providers and data center operators have to manage more dynamically the IP addressing and provisioning of network nodes, including various network transition scenarios such as IPv4 as a service, where IP address and prefixes consumption are critical and require timely and dynamic reallocations. An initial set of providers have expressed requirements, but with different scopes (eg: only IP addressing and prefix management and delegation, vs larger provisioning scope). Some initial prototyping of solutions and field trial has started. The intent of the bof is to gather a common set of requirements from a larger set of operators and, if needed, possible protocol work milestones and scope. Status: not WG-forming Drafts: draft-xi-ps-centralized-address-management draft-sun-i2apm-address-pool-management-arch draft-sun-i2apm-address-pool-management-yang The responsible Area Director (AD): OPS or INT BoF Chairs (or the ADs as placeholders): Marc Blanchet and ... Proponents: Chongfeng Xie(CT), Ying Cheng(CU) Number of people expected to attend: 100 Length of session: 1.5 hour Conflicts to avoid (first priority): sdnrg, nfv, intarea, nfvrg, opsawg Conflicts to avoid (second priority): dtn, sunset4
- [OPSAWG] bof proposal review Marc Blanchet
- Re: [OPSAWG] bof proposal review joel jaeggli
- Re: [OPSAWG] bof proposal review Marc Blanchet
- Re: [OPSAWG] bof proposal review Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [OPSAWG] bof proposal review Marc Blanchet