Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds-04

Hi Juergen,

thank you for the positive feedback.

Concerning draft-ietf-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream and
draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model, I asked already our AD
with an email after the submission of our draft. They seem 
to be underway and will be available at the latest during the 
publication of draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds as 
Informational RFC. RFC Editor can then replace the I-D 
reference with the corresponding RFC reference.

Concerning draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview I had to delete the 
corresponding text, as it expired already in November 2011 and
I did not get any answer to my earlier mail to the authors.
I assume it is not going to be finalized soon. 

May be OPSAWG chairs know more than I do and can say a few 
clarifying words. 

Cheers, 
Mehmet 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ops-area-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ops-area-bounces@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of
> ext Juergen Schoenwaelder
> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 2:40 PM
> To: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
> Cc: opsawg@ietf.org; ops-area@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OPS-AREA] draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds-04 - is
there
> consensus?
> 
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 03:45:37PM -0800, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > 	We've WGLC'd this document twice, and each time we've gotten
submissions
> and suggestions.  The authors have updated the text based on the last
WGLC
> responses.  As most of the response has been fairly positive, we would
like to move
> this version of the document to the IESG for approval.  If anyone has
serious
> objections - please raise them on the list within 72 hours from now
(say midnight
> Friday, 10 Feb, UTC).  Silence is acceptance :)
> >
> 
> I looked through the diffs and they seem to be fine. Before this
> document goes to the IESG, we should perhaps clear the open issues
> listed in Appendix C:
> 
>    o  What is the status of draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview?  It
expired
>       on November 2011.
> 
>    o  Decide what to do with following references:
> 
>    o  What is the status of
draft-ietf-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream-08?
>       (RFC Ed Queue for 569 days, depends on
>       draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-13.txt awaiting author action)
> 
>    o  What is the status of draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-10?
>       (RFC Ed Queue for 198 days, depends on
draft-ietf-ipfix-psamp-mib
>       awaiting AD-Go-Ahead::External Party)
> 
> /js
> 
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> _______________________________________________
> OPS-AREA mailing list
> OPS-AREA@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area

Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds-04 - is there consensus?