IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview returned to working group

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Fri, 07 June 2013 09:42 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40AC721F960D for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 02:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EuIVkAz3qwSc for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 02:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AC621F96FB for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 02:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r579gj21002680; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 11:42:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.60.67.87] (ams-bclaise-8916.cisco.com [10.60.67.87]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r579g5Pa001788; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 11:42:15 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <51B1AAED.2000605@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:42:05 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
References: <51AFAC20.8040403@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51AFAC20.8040403@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview@tools.ietf.org>, "opsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <opsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview returned to working group
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 09:42:58 -0000

Significant issues have been raised with the document during the IESG 
review, dated from August 2011. Only 5 ADs are currently active from 
that period.
Therefore, I'm sending the document back to the working group for 
resolution of those issues, to make sure that the working group fully 
understands the issues and is in control of managing the resolution.

Regards, Benoit
> draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview has been returned to the working
> group by the IESG.  There is an unresolved DISCUSS, and the one
> YES on the document was from an AD who is no longer on the IESG
> (Ron Bonica).
>
> The IESG evaluation record can be found at:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview/ballot/.
>
> Next steps would include revision of the draft to accommodate the
> issues raised during IESG review.
>
> Melinda
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email