[OPSAWG]Re: RFC 10014 on Guidelines for Characterizing the Term "OAM"

[[e-mail]]

Hi all,

Indeed!

Thanks also to IPPM participants and chairs and special thanks to Tal for bridging the views.

Cheers,
Med

De : Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=[e-mail]>
Envoyé : mardi 30 juin 2026 20:20
Cc : [e-mail]
Objet : [OPSAWG]Re: RFC 10014 on Guidelines for Characterizing the Term "OAM"


Congratulations, authors, shepherd, and WG!  I know this was a lot of back and forth review and refinement.  Well done!

Joe

From: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Date: Tuesday, June 30, 2026 at 14:15
To: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Cc: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Subject: [OPSAWG]RFC 10014 on Guidelines for Characterizing the Term "OAM"
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        BCP 161
        RFC 10014

        Title:      Guidelines for Characterizing the Term "OAM"
        Author:     C. Pignataro,
                    A. Farrel,
                    T. Mizrahi
        Status:     Best Current Practice
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       June 2026
        Mailbox:    [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>,
                    [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>,
                    [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
        Pages:      12
        Updates:    RFC 6291


        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization-17

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc10014

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC10014

As the IETF continues to produce and standardize different Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) protocols and technologies, various qualifiers and modifiers are prepended to the OAM abbreviation. While, at first glance, the most used qualifiers appear to be well understood, the same qualifier may be interpreted differently in different contexts. A case in point is the qualifiers "in-band" and "out-of-band", which have their origins in the radio lexicon, and which have been extrapolated into other communication networks. This document recommends not to use these two terms when referring to OAM.

This document considers some common qualifiers and modifiers that are prepended, within the context of packet networks, to the OAM abbreviation and lays out guidelines for their use in IETF documents.

This document extends RFC 6291 by adding to the guidelines for the use of the term "OAM" with qualifiers. It does not modify any part of RFC 6291.

This document is a product of the Operations and Management Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF.

BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the
Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search/
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/series/rfc-download/

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.