[OPSEC] Comments on draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering
Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> Tue, 29 May 2018 16:18 UTC
Return-Path: <tom@herbertland.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A811250B8 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 May 2018 09:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=herbertland-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mXeUTQQl4fmJ for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 May 2018 09:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22a.google.com (mail-qt0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22E3D126BF3 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 May 2018 09:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id e8-v6so19376339qth.0 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 May 2018 09:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=herbertland-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=y98Dky0NiFrhQP2bvCo6bhr+pYz4dk8exklVzTITKjU=; b=kWTLTMLAkUR7aytnTjIB5Wn54FD7E3FJQeXufvcouY95tPpq5VlUIyTY4raarj07U6 1mfAyEaWk7GWNA8xRPGrL8xc50wi4+0g5GtjwoJN4QbKjFtXu8oPaSNfiue6Jq5OvZxm tKReAktIXfj5M/1Uga85EWM/z/knRIWNKsibqtaK1wRd2+THWaNkEW/uTvKjeQvZ9vqQ j86a75YW5t5O97/SQ5LzDawTWVnkgYFK2XHYvlMGQi1YwWjGKSG7NIo2TbFAndIE1rvN woyhPJRct4LgerG8xOG5vanNyncvww91HRxF5kVv34BuoSU4TpY6dp2Fvpi67mw+L/7K XSng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=y98Dky0NiFrhQP2bvCo6bhr+pYz4dk8exklVzTITKjU=; b=n6PdSs38LvKbeniScwDM2wffZ9O1EMVdYjvoWWMdqkW1a8iPwLzxTS2Xy3zJjQ43b2 vPlgbzFaNTLoFseagQgkghUjcclsrU7ZAjC8nXMHn2XlnzYRANDOga3/rp90c5QOQ2yZ rBMoOFG+j0BfefLkF//In4h8/mgILCMruV8x7B8tcMBsQAB43N2LLQQLzFpL7lPwieTU yiNMbm+axYCPHQDZDMPMl2BVBO1lkUZx5K661Nw/uo7pIjddfdbVom/QWAWXOd5ijBrO 71naewXp2XsRzcHzXqrlqqhoju8Rp85zpCmgu+8m988mUcBNInRelA9D9QzlDtSa0T0P edVA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwcaetZv7K+6Q5PFhsA5W9fpMiwDADrGYfGFq+t+YoSUFCIy7HsU Wg4svjtZ9UzQTel8QT+l+28jCe0hdx89EbCWEIiQnuFX
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJR0VrQB9uoLSxrZnsG59yxXSgMt/HX26uVm6fCxGSka9GeMR2gZm94RxbN9RuOc3GFQC12fWSIzx2UvlS2pEs=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:33f6:: with SMTP id d51-v6mr17174643qtb.254.1527610682900; Tue, 29 May 2018 09:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:aed:3042:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 29 May 2018 09:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 09:18:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CALx6S36OkBcYf5ooFoepidRy280OD9v4YemqaX-jK1mEaYzEZQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: opsec@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/1lmwh66Qtg7ZwWMkYD9OUzjsMdk>
Subject: [OPSEC] Comments on draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 16:18:06 -0000
Hello, There's a couple of drafts that may be relevant to this. Section 5.3 of draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis describes how a host may drop packets that contain to many options in an DO or HBH EH (i.e. a mitigation against DOS attack). draft-ietf-6man-icmp-limits describes ICMP errors that may be sent if a packet with EH is dropped because it's limits for processing the extension headers are exceeded. Tom
- [OPSEC] Comments on draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filt… Tom Herbert
- Re: [OPSEC] Comments on draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-… Fernando Gont