Re: [OPSEC] Call for adoption of draft-gont-opsec-ip-options-filtering

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Fri, 08 June 2012 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B22411E80F9 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.366
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.366 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.233, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QQotWiz++6Ov for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vimes.kumari.net (vimes.kumari.net [198.186.192.250]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99E411E80F1 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-172-19-118-235.cbf.corp.google.com (unknown [64.13.52.115]) by vimes.kumari.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C5B61B4039F for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:49:28 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
In-Reply-To: <55C66AF5-F84F-44BF-9972-8725244F3302@kumari.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 14:49:25 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <229B797E-BF6D-4774-A42C-7C7F15F5DA07@kumari.net>
References: <55C66AF5-F84F-44BF-9972-8725244F3302@kumari.net>
To: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Call for adoption of draft-gont-opsec-ip-options-filtering
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:49:29 -0000

On May 24, 2012, at 11:58 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:

> Dear Working Group,
> 
> This is to start a two week poll to adopt
>   draft-gont-opsec-ip-options-filtering ( helpful link: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-opsec-ip-options-filtering-04)
> as an OpSec Working Group draft.
> 
> Please send your comments to the OpSec list (opsec@ietf.org).
> 
> This adoption call closes on June 7th, 2012.

Apologies, I was on a plane on the 7th and didn't get a chance to send the "This is now closed!" mail…. Anyway, this is now closed :-p

While I would have liked to see more comments, there was enough to adopt, so:

The author is requested to resubmit the document as draft-ietf-opsec-ip-options-filtering-00.

Thank you to everyone who provided comments and feedback…


W

> 
> (This document was discussed in the Paris meeting, and not enough people had read the document to be able to predict consensus. Please take a moment (or 5) to read and comment. I should mention that Memorial Day is coming up in the US soon -- there is nothing quite so enjoyable as reading drafts on the beach -- try it!)
> 
> W
> 
> -- 
> With Feudalism, it's your Count that votes.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
> 

-- 
With Feudalism, it's your Count that votes.