Re: [OPSEC] The plan... / adoption of draft-bhatia-manral-igp-crypto-requirements-04
Alfred Hönes <ah@TR-Sys.de> Fri, 04 December 2009 22:41 UTC
Return-Path: <A.Hoenes@TR-Sys.de>
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE103A6A72 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:41:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.714
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.714 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.463, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B0IL4bd-vqiG for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:41:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TR-Sys.de (gateway.tr-sys.de [213.178.172.147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F563A6A66 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:41:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ZEUS.TR-Sys.de by w. with ESMTP ($Revision: 1.37.109.26 $/16.3.2) id AA265296417; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 23:40:17 +0100
Received: (from ah@localhost) by z.TR-Sys.de (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183)/8.7.3) id XAA27245; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 23:40:16 +0100 (MEZ)
From: Alfred Hönes <ah@TR-Sys.de>
Message-Id: <200912042240.XAA27245@TR-Sys.de>
To: opsec@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:40:16 +0100
X-Mailer: ELM [$Revision: 1.17.214.3 $]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="hp-roman8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] The plan... / adoption of draft-bhatia-manral-igp-crypto-requirements-04
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:41:28 -0000
At Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:13:49 +0530, Glen Kent wrote: >> ... >> >> draft-bhatia-manral-igp-crypto-requirements-04 - test for inclusion as a >> wg document >> >> Document can be reviewed here: >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bhatia-manral-igp-crypto-requirements-04 >> > > I firmly believe that we need such a document and fully support this. > > Glen +1 I had reviewed all three of the "more recent" RFCs referred to in that synoptical draft, and I share the opinion that such synopsis and evaluation document gives very useful guidance. I commit to perform a detailed review of the draft -- but this will certainly take me some time again, perhaps late in January. I'd also like to draw the group's attention to a short individual draft originating from DNSEXT and DNSOP, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words-02 that aims at establishing schematic keywords (a la RFC 2119) for use in IANA registry to indicate maintenance/support levels (as seen by the IETF/IESG) of protocol options, in particular cryptographic algorithms. One objective is to establish a more lightweight and uniform method to indicate and maintain implementation requirements. This efforts is somehow related to the above draft and seems to be very useful from an operational perspective, and I'd like to encourage you to review and support this draft; publication already is requested; Russ Housley is shepherding the document (GEN area, lacking a wg, needs a couple of drafts to justify its persistence :-) ) and I expect IETF LC soon. Kind regards, Alfred Hönes. -- +------------------------+--------------------------------------------+ | TR-Sys Alfred Hoenes | Alfred Hoenes Dipl.-Math., Dipl.-Phys. | | Gerlinger Strasse 12 | Phone: (+49)7156/9635-0, Fax: -18 | | D-71254 Ditzingen | E-Mail: ah@TR-Sys.de | +------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
- Re: [OPSEC] The plan... / adoption of draft-bhati… Alfred Hönes
- Re: [OPSEC] The plan... / adoption of draft-bhati… Joel Jaeggli