[OPSEC] WGLC on draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering is closed and positive
"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Mon, 18 June 2018 17:22 UTC
Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46097130DF9; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 10:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4b4-kjanr_b5; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 10:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AAFE130DF6; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 10:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1010; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1529342537; x=1530552137; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=lsdDcWp8dTq/wPyXDrEuQNcBRNzAbhJX2rB0fpdoRpI=; b=FiMOLtw2SGksNcsPVlRQpCyxnyygp2UTYuxRxbhMLyHuTnEacEkDiF98 DTR8YWnbgVzw9o654IiGA+y21ntotDX9WG0oIAFy3jpuj729Ty2VrC2bl GNIT8zXZAgY3IWWeiX03+H+K+ZXFtSzKEcdOzqSehUh+7lKAomLDRvuFV 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DiAACH6Sdb/5pdJa1bGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNIgWEoCoNviASMUIFelRKBeAuEbBmCSCE0GAECAQEBAQEBAm0ohVIRRRIBIgImAgQwFRIEAQ0FgyWCAaoAghyIRYFogQuHSYFUP4EPJAyHaIJqMYIkApkWCQKPB407kSYCERMBgSQdOIFScBVlAYIYkE9vjzeBGgEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,240,1526342400"; d="scan'208";a="131567690"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Jun 2018 17:22:16 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-016.cisco.com (xch-rtp-016.cisco.com [64.101.220.156]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w5IHMG5a014749 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 18 Jun 2018 17:22:16 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-016.cisco.com (64.101.220.156) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 13:22:15 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 13:22:15 -0400
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, "draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering@ietf.org>
CC: "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC on draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering is closed and positive
Thread-Index: AQHUByjmJy6Et0AOS0GkJaY+m1N4/g==
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 17:22:15 +0000
Message-ID: <54A03EEA-8DD1-4A5C-8621-2494694EA27D@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.c.0.180410
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.155.72.21]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <024AFD88F4484D4BBA6C009C6C50BAFF@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/FkBanst6x82Vgdp_XwAYjBtod7c>
Subject: [OPSEC] WGLC on draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering is closed and positive
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 17:22:20 -0000
The WGLC on this document is now closed and the outcome if positive. Authors, would you mind submitting a revised version addressing the comments of Darren Dukes (see below) so that we can submit this revision to the IESG queue. -éric & -ron On 30/05/2018, 20:30, "OPSEC on behalf of Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <opsec-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of ddukes@cisco.com> wrote: Section 3.4.2.5 contradicts section 3.3 on handling of unknown RHT’s. Section 3.4.2.5 contradicts section 3.4.2.4 assessment of operational impact. It appears to me that 3.4.3.5 should state: Intermediate systems should discard packets containing a RHT0 or RHT1. Other routing header types should be permitted.
- [OPSEC] WGLC on draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filterin… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)