IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] Adoption Call: draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-addressing

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Mon, 10 April 2023 07:28 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8E7C14CEFA; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.308
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.308 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.592, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O5RMOvPiQF-i; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:28:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39F59C14CEFC; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.41.89.143] (unknown [77.241.232.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7EA1280576; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 04:28:10 -0300 (-03)
Message-ID: <c102fdba-2c52-6060-718d-a96c7a7086ff@si6networks.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2023 23:12:19 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>, opsec WG <opsec@ietf.org>
Cc: OpSec Chairs <opsec-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-addressing@ietf.org" <draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-addressing@ietf.org>
References: <CAFU7BATDr25meXdUnOGHoWGhDjAU93sGb4FUPtK5PtVi41PZfg@mail.gmail.com> <C0864591-2C3A-4ED3-9ABF-47DF76C5B350@cisco.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Organization: SI6 Networks
In-Reply-To: <C0864591-2C3A-4ED3-9ABF-47DF76C5B350@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/Fu3q7VAHmBvS560DKe3xzSEgpYA>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Adoption Call: draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-addressing
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 07:28:26 -0000

Hello, Eric,

On 8/4/23 02:13, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
> May I suggest that this draft, at the bare minimum, has RFC 9099 (an
> OPSEC document) in its references list? Notably because the draft
> sections about network correlation is already addressed in RFC 9099
> section 2.6 and others.

This was my bad '' this )and other references) is in our TO-DO list for 
the next rev.

Thanks!

Fernando




-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: F242 FF0E A804 AF81 EB10 2F07 7CA1 321D 663B B494

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email