Re: [OPSEC] draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only IETF last-call

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Sun, 13 April 2014 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60201A02C6 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 08:55:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.172
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.172 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p4vZ6tWKwusU for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 08:55:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC651A01DE for <OpSec@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 08:55:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mb-aye.local (c-67-171-230-191.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.171.230.191]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s3DFtVUT052851 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 13 Apr 2014 15:55:31 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <534AB36E.7050601@bogus.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 08:55:26 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:28.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/28.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, "'draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only@tools.ietf.org'" <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only@tools.ietf.org>, "'opsec-chairs@tools.ietf.org'" <opsec-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "'OpSec@ietf.org'" <OpSec@ietf.org>
References: <97EB7536A2B2C549846804BBF3FD47E123D07FC5@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <97EB7536A2B2C549846804BBF3FD47E123D07FC5@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TR94apeMDnm5l3fhQPj4rv7COQ6AJ0bh2"
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Sun, 13 Apr 2014 15:55:31 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/KRS96Ixmjbj7968vYhJAyPSM2xc
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only IETF last-call
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 15:55:37 -0000

Thanks guys.

joel

On 4/13/14, 8:48 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
> Joel
> 
> Thanks for your message 
> 
> Michael and I will come back to you
> 
> Eric
> 
> ----- Message d'origine -----
> De : joel jaeggli [mailto:joelja@bogus.com]
> Envoyé : Sunday, April 13, 2014 05:45 PM
> À : draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only@tools.ietf.org <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only@tools.ietf.org>; opsec chairs <opsec-chairs@tools.ietf.org>; opsec@ietf.org <OpSec@ietf.org>
> Objet : draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only IETF last-call
> 
> Folks,
> 
> What I took away from the IETF LC is not that this document is
> unsuitable for publication, but that a suitably dire warning with
> respect to the limitations needs to be attached (probably in the
> introduction). It is my feeling from my colleagues on the IESG that they
> are relatively opposed to the idea of an IESG statement being applied to
> say this if the authors can do so in conjunction with the community.
> 
> Thanks
> joel
> 
>