Re: [OPSEC] Call for Adoption: draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-nd-security-01

Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> Thu, 26 September 2013 13:01 UTC

Return-Path: <aservin@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691D421F9B8A for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 06:01:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lbJY9v5MPk9d for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 06:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D879F21F9BD0 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 06:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Arturos-MacBook-Pro.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:7000:e5d5:33e6:cdb7:d97b]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF9B30849A for <opsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:00:32 -0300 (UYT)
Message-ID: <52443007.6050000@lacnic.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:00:55 -0300
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
Organization: LACNIC
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: opsec@ietf.org
References: <522B3D9F-07EA-4595-80E4-50B406F0B3A0@kumari.net> <A51E909F-0D94-413C-B5B7-9BDEBF4E5929@kumari.net>
In-Reply-To: <A51E909F-0D94-413C-B5B7-9BDEBF4E5929@kumari.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Call for Adoption: draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-nd-security-01
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:01:21 -0000

	Yes, adopt.

	This document presents a good assestment of the
challenges/problems/vulnerabilities that ND has.

Regards,
as

On 9/16/13 7:01 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> A reminder that this adoption call is ongoing…
> 
> Please review the draft and comment if you think that this should be adopted (or not)
> 
> W
> On Sep 11, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> 
>> Dear OpSec WG,
>>
>> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-nd-security-01.
>>
>> The draft is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-nd-security-01/
>>
>> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by OpSec,
>> and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
>>
>> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.
>>
>> This WGLC ends Wed 25-Sep-2013.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Warren Kumari
>> (as OpSec WG co-chair)
>>
>>
>> --
>> After you'd known Christine for any length of time, you found yourself fighting a desire to look into her ear to see if you could spot daylight coming the other way.
>>
>>    -- (Terry Pratchett, Maskerade)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OPSEC mailing list
>> OPSEC@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>>
>