[OPSEC] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kumari-blackhole-urpf-02
Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Thu, 30 October 2008 20:28 UTC
Return-Path: <opsec-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: opsec-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-opsec-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECF93A67EA; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E463A67EA for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zZNjIk4ltsVY for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0DF3A67D6 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.11.143] (c-67-171-158-173.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.171.158.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m9UKSS6e099706 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <opsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:28:30 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <490A18EC.7030401@bogus.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:28:28 -0700
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: opsec wg mailing list <opsec@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/8544/Thu Oct 30 18:59:19 2008 on nagasaki.bogus.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: [OPSEC] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kumari-blackhole-urpf-02
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
Made it into the tool recently. This version addresses some of the commentary on previous versions. I except that we'll ask for consesus on accepting this as a working group document at Minneapolis. Any commentary on the revised draft would be appreciated. diffs are here: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kumari-blackhole-urpf-02.txt thanks joel _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list OPSEC@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
- [OPSEC] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kumari-b… Joel Jaeggli