[OPSEC] Draft Agenda for OPSEC @IETF85
KK <kk@google.com> Wed, 24 October 2012 21:11 UTC
Return-Path: <kkumar@google.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCCE21F8B88 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.785
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.785 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.191, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O4b82et9vAKc for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-f44.google.com (mail-qa0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20F021F8B6C for <opsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id 25so3024857qao.10 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-system-of-record; bh=EOMVF/epbWcO8lHjiy9LwlL18Q1P8lpx8FJcVcy3ld0=; b=HvcMKuo9wF7mM+XHwIkSoJocODCHPA5Cvy7BS2CAO7UI1iLPLBz/rRgseCUaq76JNK rQpo8m0yGMVAh5tJc+JkTWarGr+yn/3HBOq/3b8NrZbEb+wHJf3ikcGdlMzbePVDgILg hdYw+pGZN9AYih1bggro/yxxZgtgZ21qQoONS5abhm226BB6CQgwyrC2hgxdPAZO6eya Mv8lu9hOTIfjzseGQLGE1bmifbBy9jhQYo9u6Mt/fkQRjco66aa/MYVOwl+wcCH3xQUQ wcKMc3p5F54hd6lFFqPmAVaKk6BuKcQoXVqFnOccLbAX9c+AapQu0PJ5eJPvId5SBlM5 f0Uw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=EOMVF/epbWcO8lHjiy9LwlL18Q1P8lpx8FJcVcy3ld0=; b=Cti+PsIH5H0EAullw3LAKITP+lDoFrjEtZGwNi5bHcFiVN425sIi7eCXh2yOBGUM2Q VPI9CrRXMMrj3PcwkbuocnAucKlVSOuALvLi6VB9jpI1csavKsp6P2iRwxi+4PAlh+hL QV2TmenvHZicdRijdy2fpVV+Vc3KUYJA9Kglbo23hrtx0KHR3M+NojFKDAkCHzbjbmaT dkUugnERruU8XCyHV/MAcRSf3Iuz+boew32vcA+vD8rklrB5329bvFhpoBqZM7TDscdR M5OOElKyp5V5esfqJm5LWL6nfn69sVGzkk/AY0ab1olT8o9/ib5xIGng7qcXEfxf2SxT 7Hkw==
Received: by 10.49.60.72 with SMTP id f8mr9631499qer.30.1351113094213; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.29.104 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: KK <kk@google.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:11:14 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKaj4uQZd_ENEErFuGV5LF6YDvTOS_q2WMWTZxyF8skrVPFz-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b6da4c4082e5404ccd488b9"
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnZ5/Y2m8PFUYkZg/j16wp9rzzxyM81p//EfElwSiZSIdMBF339PkrUusH3C6uMBGsFvt/3eSs+x59vaEjfJN7o01bWTmpDhePxy9E/8vFKujJ78ttFHVUYpFLPHHG2uzeetepY7+v5UI3eMincgADiX+6GyI5Qx9TuunNqbUxEYL51NlGB6T84SW/G9YQKLsIXel4E
Cc: "opsec-chairs@ietf.org" <opsec-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [OPSEC] Draft Agenda for OPSEC @IETF85
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 21:11:35 -0000
Hey Folks, A draft agenda has been posted here<http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/85/agenda/agenda-85-opsec> . """ *Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure - IETF 85 Friday, Nov 9, 0900 - 1100 Room: Salon C ----------------------- Administrivia, Agenda Bashing, 10 Minutes Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only/>, 15 Minutes Operational Security Considerations for IPv6 Networks draft-ietf-opsec-v6<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/>, 15 minutes BGP Operations and Security draft-jdurand-bgp-security<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jdurand-bgp-security/>, 20 Minutes Network Reconnaissance in IPv6 Networks draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning/>, 15 Minutes DHCPv6-Shield: Protecting Against Rogue DHCPv6 Servers draft-gont-opsec-dhcpv6-shield<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gont-opsec-dhcpv6-shield/>, 10 Minutes Virtual Private Network (VPN) traffic leakages in dual-stack hosts/networks draft-gont-opsec-vpn-leakages<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gont-opsec-vpn-leakages/>, 15 Minutes Passive IP addresses draft-baker-opsec-passive-ip-address<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-baker-opsec-passive-ip-address/>, 15 minutes """* * Regards,* *KK, Gunter, Warren *