IETF Logo Mail Archive

[OPSEC] IPv6 OPSEC drafts need review

"Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com> Mon, 06 August 2012 08:51 UTC

Return-Path: <gvandeve@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9D621F858A; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 01:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.396
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.202, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nZeBuqC5-C1C; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 01:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E490E21F8541; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 01:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=gvandeve@cisco.com; l=6187; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1344243070; x=1345452670; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=pv+9GhIfX8hWTTwol2z/EDfFD58lKfdRTSuh8P28L8A=; b=kq+CetO9F7KWtqbFPR3Uhb20SbRNx9sXz0nxCnc3H86T8uBVrwYYHwIW 8clNyv/jc08csYJoXNbSUHn4cGx2IyibH9LVjt9GtS8M+koDU9JT+OV/c T3h4hBr7BWa2Sx+p0BczJnPpVbjWqaPLyiyipLO607roUNjIaXit16Az9 M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhsFAOyEH1CtJXHA/2dsb2JhbABFgkqmFIgPAYhQgQeCIgEEEgEKEEwSASpWJgEEDg0ah2sLmzqfVJFuYAOWXY0SgWaCX4Ff
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.77,718,1336348800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="108719066"
Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Aug 2012 08:51:09 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q768p96I010708 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 6 Aug 2012 08:51:09 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com ([169.254.7.122]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 03:51:09 -0500
From: "Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com>
To: "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPv6 OPSEC drafts need review
Thread-Index: Ac1zr7XviImO0VW9ShaYOQMMM67U3A==
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 08:51:08 +0000
Message-ID: <67832B1175062E48926BF3CB27C49B240674DA@xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.55.88.65]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19088.004
x-tm-as-result: No--32.390100-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_67832B1175062E48926BF3CB27C49B240674DAxmbalnx12ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "draft-vyncke-opsec-v6@tools.ietf.org" <draft-vyncke-opsec-v6@tools.ietf.org>, "v6ops v6ops WG (v6ops@ietf.org)" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "Warren Kumari (warren@kumari.net)" <warren@kumari.net>, "draft-jdurant-bgp-security-01@tools.ietf.org" <draft-jdurant-bgp-security-01@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [OPSEC] IPv6 OPSEC drafts need review
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 08:51:10 -0000

Dear all,

As mentioned during the OPSEC WG meeting, the following 2 drafts will in 3 weeks be considered for WG documents, after a call for feedback on the email list. During the WG meeting it became clear that not that many people read the documents until now.

Please read drafts:


1)      http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vyncke-opsec-v6/

2)      http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jdurand-bgp-security-01

On Monday 27th the chairs of OPSEC WG will ask the WG during a period of 7 days for feedback on these drafts to support or deny acceptance as WG documents.

Kind Regards,
G/, KK & Warren

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email